re: Windows 2000 vs. XP Tuesday, February 12, 2002 at 6:19 pm Windows 2000 Annoyances Discussion Forum Posted by BrandonMartensen (7 messages posted) I recommend using Windows 2000 because of Windows XP's strict hardware requirements and product activation scheme. On Tuesday, February 12, 2002 at 12:21 pm, Scott Wilson wrote: >I am managing an office of 35 users. Most of us are still using Win95/98. >It's time to upgrade. We are planning upgrade to W2k or XP. We will most likely >be using Office XP (as we get non-profit pricing). Our Domain server is NT 6 (sp6a). > > >Does anyone have any thoughts on which OS would better suit us? My experience with >W2K is that it is pretty stable. I am already overworked as it is and want the least >amount of problems to work with. How is XP with older hardware 3,4,5 years old hardware? > >TIA > Written in response to: Windows 2000 vs. XP (Scott Wilson: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 at 12:21 pm) There are presently no replies to this message. All messages in this thread [show all] Windows 2000 vs. XP (Scott Wilson: Tue, Feb 12, 2002, 12:21 pm) re: Windows 2000 vs. XP (Michael: Tue, Feb 12, 2002, 12:30 pm) re: Windows 2000 vs. XP (Curt R: Tue, Feb 12, 2002, 12:56 pm) re: Windows 2000 vs. XP (Scott Wilson: Tue, Feb 12, 2002, 1:08 pm) re: Windows 2000 vs. XP (BrandonMartensen: Tue, Feb 12, 2002, 6:19 pm) Reply or follow-up to this message Search this forum Start a new thread on a different subject Report abuse of the forum Return to the Windows 2000 Discussion Forum