|
|
|
re: W2K vs XP?'
Thursday, September 12, 2002 at 9:47 pm Windows 2000 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by A Snider
(21 messages posted)
Is that a crack about ISP nerds?
Honestly though, unless your ISP is using NAT or a proxy server, then you have a
public IP add which is hanging out there for any jerk to ping at, or attempt to enter
your backorifice or whatever. Your only recourse is a good firewall, which you already
have done.
Regarding XP vs 2K, to tell you the truth my experience has been just the opposite.
XP Pro has been rock-solid, while the 2K machine has been nothing but a pain (blue-screens,
rebooting, leaving db files opened, etcetc). As much as I hate to admit it publicly,
I like XP better, and it's not just because it's pretty. And I still use NT4 Server
too, see no reason to replace something that's worked so well for 4-5 years.
Well, that's one man's opinion. Take it for what it's worth.
Alan
On Friday, September 6, 2002 at 12:24 pm, brian slater wrote:
>I have a question about What's
>the difference between Windows 2000 and Windows XP?:
>
>I heard a lot of bad things so far about XP, wont load software it doesnt like (has
>to be M$ certified), it crashes and locks up badly and worst of all you give M$
control
>over your PC
>
>I have upgrade from W98 after years of regular crashes and unreliable performance
>(thank goodness for Norton System Works, you cannot be without it on W98)
>
>My observation so far is that W2K is far more stable and fault tolerant. It pretty
>much works like a dream (excep for some bad software from the Multimedia industry
>- very flaky stuff. But I did get a megacrash and it wiped out the OS. I had to
buy
>an additional harddrive and reinstall. This was cause by my trying to fit a Matrox
>AGP video card (they didnt bother to say get the latest drivers before installation.
> However, 2 weeks work down the drain (not data, which i revovered, but reinstallation
>of apps)
>
>That aside, W2K does seem ok. Ive now got to go to great lengths to protect is from
>the net. Get mozilla, and a different mailer, I am told. Ive got Norton Firewall,
>Is it good enough. Ive had several backorifice attempts alarmed. Its strange that
>these only occur in the wee small hours? I suspect some little nerd in my ISP playing
>around on the night shift. Do you agree?
>
>Grateful for your comments, to share is to support the common cause
>
>Brian
>
- Written in response to:
- W2K vs XP?' (brian slater: Friday, September 6, 2002 at 12:24 pm)
Responses to this message:
|
|
All messages in this thread [show all]
 |  | re: W2K vs XP?' (A Snider: Thu, Sep 12, 2002, 9:47 pm) |
| |
| |
Return to the Windows 2000 Discussion Forum
|
|
|
|