|
|
|
re: Upgrading to Win2K
Saturday, February 8, 2003 at 2:57 am
Windows 2000 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by James Oakey
(188 messages posted)
You will never get it to run with only 8 Meg of RAM. I have tried many times to get
it to run on systems with under 64Megs and it has never worked. I don't know why
they made the minimum 32 Megs when it really should have been 64 Megs.
On Friday, February 7, 2003 at 7:29 am, Peter wrote:
>Is there anyway else so that I can upgrade but bypass the requirements section (as
>32mb Ram instead of the eight I have)?? I tried dos, but that won't work...
- Written in response to:
- Upgrading to Win2K (Peter: Friday, February 7, 2003 at 7:29 am)
There are presently no replies to this message.
|
|
All messages in this thread [show all]
 |  | re: Upgrading to Win2K (James Oakey: Sat, Feb 8, 2003, 2:57 am) |
| |
| |
Return to the Windows 2000 Discussion Forum
|
|
|
|
