re: Question about 'What's the difference between Windows 2000 and Windows XP?'
Thursday, February 20, 2003 at 12:15 pm Windows 2000 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Daniel
(1 messages posted)
XP becomes more Maclike. It has a builtin program compatibility wizard to run older
applications not suited for a NT environment. Another thing its file system is cross
between 9x and NT. Also I am finding out that the wizard can be a power tool to
run memory draining apps w/o the need for more memory. I noticed some programs have
2 separate requirements for ram usage: one for 9x and the other for 2000/XP.
On Monday, September 2, 2002 at 10:54 am, T23 User wrote:
>I have a question about What's
>the difference between Windows 2000 and Windows XP?:
>
>Microsoft claims XP is faster. How is that possible with bloatware. XP takes more
>memory than W2K, has more useless features, requires a faster processor, and what
>can't I do with W2K that I need to do with XP? And then there is an exteremly-limiting
>key code for registration... come on Microsoft, who are you fooling?
>
>So I've made my opinions clear. Here is a more scientific study on the differences
>between XP and W2K:
>
>http://www.infoworld.com/articles/tc/xml/01/10/29/011029tcwinxp.xml
>
>Simpler is better. Don't believe the hype and get the most out of your CPU.
>
>Regards all.
>
>
|
All messages in this thread [show all]
 |  | re: Question about 'What's the difference between Windows 2000 and Windows XP?' (Daniel: Thu, Feb 20, 2003, 12:15 pm) |
| |
| |
| |
Return to the Windows 2000 Discussion Forum
|
|