Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 2000 Discussion Forum » Message 1051728396 Search | Help | Home
  
re: W2K vs XP?'
Wednesday, April 30, 2003 at 11:46 am
Windows 2000 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by TDP (3 messages posted)


hmm. i like XP because of its interface. 2k is ok, but it doesn't like Norton Firewall. other than that, i dont really notice a difference if you want a stable OS for simple tasks, Dual boot with Linux... run games etc on Win, and Office apps etc on Linux. i recommend either Debian linux (www.debian.org) or Redhat Linux (www.redhat.com)


Written in response to:
re: W2K vs XP?' (Roddy: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 at 12:06 pm)

Responses to this message:
*re: W2K vs XP?' (David Gagnon: Monday, January 31, 2005 at 9:59 pm)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-W2K vs XP?' (brian slater: Fri, Sep 6, 2002, 12:24 pm)
-re: W2K vs XP?' (A Snider: Thu, Sep 12, 2002, 9:47 pm)
-re: W2K vs XP?' (Roddy: Wed, Mar 19, 2003, 12:06 pm)
-re: W2K vs XP?' (TDP: Wed, Apr 30, 2003, 11:46 am)
*re: W2K vs XP?' (David Gagnon: Mon, Jan 31, 2005, 9:59 pm)
*re: W2K vs XP?' (factotum218: Fri, Apr 22, 2005, 5:19 pm)
-re: W2K vs XP?' (John Jamieson: Fri, Jun 3, 2005, 9:47 am)
-re: W2K vs XP?' (Sythem: Mon, Jun 6, 2005, 6:40 pm)
-re: W2K vs XP?' (Peter Griffin: Mon, Aug 29, 2005, 7:06 pm)
*re: W2K vs XP?' (J: Sat, Jan 14, 2006, 7:11 pm)
-re: W2K vs XP?' (Naveen Gupta: Wed, Nov 23, 2005, 9:25 pm)
*re: W2K vs XP?' (J: Sat, Jan 14, 2006, 7:01 pm)
*re: W2K vs XP?' (Jude Nihal Fernando: Fri, Dec 1, 2006, 6:36 pm)
Return to the Windows 2000 Discussion Forum

All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2008 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.