Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 2000 Discussion Forum » Message 1118108401 Search | Help | Home
  
re: W2K vs XP?'
Monday, June 6, 2005 at 6:40 pm
Windows 2000 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Sythem (1 messages posted)


I personally having used all but win2K pretty extensively still perfer my win98. Linux being too complicated for most people and XP just being a resource hog. Though for anyone computer savey and has a highspeed connection might want to give linux a try for everything other than most video games thought the ones that have been ported to linux run wonderfully compaired to any win distro if the kernel has configured for that computer. Not to mention it's free.


Written in response to:
re: W2K vs XP?' (John Jamieson: Friday, June 3, 2005 at 9:47 am)

Responses to this message:
*re: W2K vs XP?' (Peter Griffin: Monday, August 29, 2005 at 7:06 pm)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-W2K vs XP?' (brian slater: Fri, Sep 6, 2002, 12:24 pm)
-re: W2K vs XP?' (A Snider: Thu, Sep 12, 2002, 9:47 pm)
-re: W2K vs XP?' (Roddy: Wed, Mar 19, 2003, 12:06 pm)
-re: W2K vs XP?' (TDP: Wed, Apr 30, 2003, 11:46 am)
*re: W2K vs XP?' (David Gagnon: Mon, Jan 31, 2005, 9:59 pm)
*re: W2K vs XP?' (factotum218: Fri, Apr 22, 2005, 5:19 pm)
-re: W2K vs XP?' (John Jamieson: Fri, Jun 3, 2005, 9:47 am)
-re: W2K vs XP?' (Sythem: Mon, Jun 6, 2005, 6:40 pm)
-re: W2K vs XP?' (Peter Griffin: Mon, Aug 29, 2005, 7:06 pm)
*re: W2K vs XP?' (J: Sat, Jan 14, 2006, 7:11 pm)
-re: W2K vs XP?' (Naveen Gupta: Wed, Nov 23, 2005, 9:25 pm)
*re: W2K vs XP?' (J: Sat, Jan 14, 2006, 7:01 pm)
*re: W2K vs XP?' (Jude Nihal Fernando: Fri, Dec 1, 2006, 6:36 pm)
Return to the Windows 2000 Discussion Forum

All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2008 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.