|
|
|
re: W2K vs XP?'
Monday, August 29, 2005 at 7:06 pm
Windows 2000 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Peter Griffin
(1 messages posted)
I have windows xp professional and windows 2000 professional and I think 2000 is
better, in fact I downgraded to windows 2000. Besides who care if you don't get the
built in firewall, because the microsoft firewal sucks anyway, you can just download
a way better firewall for free like I did. I really enjoy windows 2000 professional
its just more simple, you can still play games on it and everything, windows xp just
looks a little different and besides you can download a XP skin for windows 2000.
I have also seen Windows Vista, it looks sucky, I am going to stay with 2000 until
I am forced to upgrade because its just faster. And my computer is 2.93 ghz 760 mb
or ram 80 gig hdd and 64 mb video card and I bought it with XP and then downgraded
to 2000 and I saw a big performance increase and web pages seem to load fasters too.
You can still use all the good programs offerd to XP like firefox, Windows Media,
nero, etrust antivirus, power dvd etc. I think windows 2000 is the way to go , I
HIGHLY RECCOMENT WINDOWS 2000 PROFESSIONAL OVER XP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Written in response to:
- re: W2K vs XP?' (Sythem: Monday, June 6, 2005 at 6:40 pm)
Responses to this message:
|
|
All messages in this thread [show all]
 |  | |  | re: W2K vs XP?' (Peter Griffin: Mon, Aug 29, 2005, 7:06 pm) |
| |
| |
Return to the Windows 2000 Discussion Forum
|
|
|
|
