re: Audio program effeciency & related questions
Wednesday, January 18, 2006 at 7:30 am
Windows 2000 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by DEX
(11739 messages posted)
Jamie
It's best to stick with NTFS if you can and put the files on the same HD and run
the program from the same.
It's like asking someone what they use in the car for oil brand name etc.but it comes
down to what you are doing with the car.
Most of the programs you will use will be just fine unless you start using the highend
programs but most don't.
(most will be mp3,wav,avi,mpg,etc.)
Just a note ,,,,You can run many HD's via the USB ports up to 147 from one USB port(s)
it that way you can have the HD's in the NTFS system and store all the files you
need from that HD (port). (480mps trans.rate,2.0 usb port).
But again it's up to you (like the oil thing) going racing or just going to work
day in day out..
Just my 2 cents
Have a good one
On Wednesday, January 18, 2006 at 7:12 am, Jamie wrote:
>Hi there I posted on here recently regarding a dismounted hard-drive and was helped
>out and told its better to have a different physical hard drive for each operating
>system (win98&win2k) different.
>
>I'm starting to get into audio recording/editing software and was told its better
>to run an audio program from one drive and save files to another? why is this?
>
>also would the performance suffer if I was to run the program from win2k (ntfs)
and
>save the audio files to my other hard-drive (fat32)?
>thanks
|
