re: Question about 'What's the difference between Windows 2000 and Windows XP?'
Tuesday, May 9, 2006 at 8:38 am Windows 2000 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Traderhut
(1 messages posted)
Microsoft claims that XP is faster, and until I read the base post here, I'd not
heard anyone else say that.
I had a Gateway computer (PIII/700) preloaded with Win 2000 Pro.
I "upgraded" to XP, and lost the ability to read DV (Digital Video) from a firewire
cam corder to the disk without dropped frames after 1-2 seconds. The I/O system
could no longer keep up...
Then I tried to play a DVD.. Not able to initialize something....
I moaned and used it that way for a year or so.. But when giving the machine to my
brother, I reformatted it back to Windows 2000 - Now everything worked again!
Granted, I *only* had a little less than 500 MB of Ram - good grief! That's enough
to do just about everything you could possibly want to do in.. or *should* be...
My new machine, a 1.7 Ghz Pent 4M - RUNNING XP seems slow compared to the 700Mz PIII...
Ok, well, they seem about the same speed... The PIII boots faster (of course, the
faster a machine is, the slower it boots... As people find things that the machine
can do while it's booting....)
Granted, I only have 1.5GB of RAM in the P4 machine :-)
With that much RAM, XP *should* be able to cache everything I've ever read from the
disk and the disk should power down from non use...
Just my two cents worth...
Oh, does anyone have a test site that shows speed tests between the two OSs?
-Chert
http://www.traderhut.com
|
All messages in this thread [show all]
 |  | re: Question about 'What's the difference between Windows 2000 and Windows XP?' (Traderhut: Tue, May 9, 2006, 8:38 am) |
| |
| |
| |
Return to the Windows 2000 Discussion Forum
|
|