Annoyances.org - re: RAM use vs total RAM available (Windows 2000 Discussion Forum)


Home » Windows 2000 Discussion Forum » Message 1186985697	Search \| Help \| Home

re: RAM use vs total RAM available
Sunday, August 12, 2007 at 11:14 pm
Windows 2000 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Rick (14 messages posted)

You're correct DES. However, I started with a Kaypro II, 64kB of RAM, 2 floppy drives and CPM. In those days 64 kB was huge. Apple only had 48 kB. Rick

On Sunday, August 12, 2007 at 9:04 pm, DEX wrote:
>Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
>Teach a man to fish and he will eat for the rest of his life.
>-- Chinese proverb --
>
>

>You must mean MB and not KB ????
>
>640kb is a drop in the bucket :) now days
>
>
>
>
>

Great Free Software Click
>Here
>C. H. Forum Click Here
>

Written in response to:
re: RAM use vs total RAM available (DEX: Sunday, August 12, 2007 at 9:04 pm)

Responses to this message:
re: RAM use vs total RAM available (Kiwi: Monday, August 13, 2007 at 6:56 am)

All messages in this thread [show all]

RAM use vs total RAM available (Rick: Sun, Aug 12, 2007, 4:23 pm)

The RAM conundrum (DNA: Sun, Aug 12, 2007, 7:36 pm)

re: The RAM conundrum (Rick: Sun, Aug 12, 2007, 10:49 pm)

re: The RAM conundrum (C K: Mon, Aug 13, 2007, 11:31 am)

2K Server can use more RAM than 2K Pro (DNA: Mon, Aug 13, 2007, 6:44 pm)

re: 2K Server can use more RAM than 2K Pro (C K: Mon, Aug 13, 2007, 7:06 pm)

re: RAM use vs total RAM available (DEX: Sun, Aug 12, 2007, 9:04 pm)

re: RAM use vs total RAM available (Rick: Sun, Aug 12, 2007, 11:14 pm)

re: RAM use vs total RAM available (Kiwi: Mon, Aug 13, 2007, 6:56 am)

re: RAM use vs total RAM available (Josh Delcore: Sun, Aug 26, 2007, 12:44 pm)

re: RAM use vs total RAM available (Josh Delcore: Tue, Sep 18, 2007, 7:47 am)

re: RAM use vs total RAM available (Rick: Sun, Sep 23, 2007, 10:51 am)

Return to the Windows 2000 Discussion Forum