Annoyances.org - re: RAM use vs total RAM available (Windows 2000 Discussion Forum)


Home » Windows 2000 Discussion Forum » Message 1187013419	Search \| Help \| Home

re: RAM use vs total RAM available
Monday, August 13, 2007 at 6:56 am
Windows 2000 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Kiwi (2096 messages posted)

I don't recall an Apple II with 48 KBs, actually, but I never played with the Apple I kit computer at all. My first IBM PC had twin 320 KB floppy drives and 256 KB of RAM (I think that they were only 320 KBs). I had to get a loan from my Employee Credit Union to buy the thing -- cost over $2000 back in 1982, when that was a lot of money.

Kiwi

**

On Sunday, August 12, 2007 at 11:14 pm, Rick wrote:
>
>... In those days 64 kB was huge. Apple only had 48 kB.
>
>
>

Written in response to:
re: RAM use vs total RAM available (Rick: Sunday, August 12, 2007 at 11:14 pm)

There are presently no replies to this message.

All messages in this thread [show all]

RAM use vs total RAM available (Rick: Sun, Aug 12, 2007, 4:23 pm)

The RAM conundrum (DNA: Sun, Aug 12, 2007, 7:36 pm)

re: The RAM conundrum (Rick: Sun, Aug 12, 2007, 10:49 pm)

re: The RAM conundrum (C K: Mon, Aug 13, 2007, 11:31 am)

2K Server can use more RAM than 2K Pro (DNA: Mon, Aug 13, 2007, 6:44 pm)

re: 2K Server can use more RAM than 2K Pro (C K: Mon, Aug 13, 2007, 7:06 pm)

re: RAM use vs total RAM available (DEX: Sun, Aug 12, 2007, 9:04 pm)

re: RAM use vs total RAM available (Rick: Sun, Aug 12, 2007, 11:14 pm)

re: RAM use vs total RAM available (Kiwi: Mon, Aug 13, 2007, 6:56 am)

re: RAM use vs total RAM available (Josh Delcore: Sun, Aug 26, 2007, 12:44 pm)

re: RAM use vs total RAM available (Josh Delcore: Tue, Sep 18, 2007, 7:47 am)

re: RAM use vs total RAM available (Rick: Sun, Sep 23, 2007, 10:51 am)

Return to the Windows 2000 Discussion Forum