re: Large drive and Win2k issues....
Saturday, November 3, 2007 at 12:29 pm
Windows 2000 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by 2000_man
(55 messages posted)
Yeah -- I meant that SP4 was slipstreamed in -- my fault!!!
As for partitions, I'm not sure why I don't like them to be perfectly honest with
you....you mentioned windows being a filing cabinet of sorts and I think I feel the
same way -- but with a different perspective on the situation. I'm really OCD about
how I keep my PC organized and it just always seemed neater to keep everything on
one disk in it's own little place - I guess a partition just complicates matters
for me. I'm faced with the dilema of what goes where....what goes on the boot drive?
What goes on the second partition (I KNOW this sounds insane....sorry!!!).
Will it, however, like you mentioned make a difference in speed to have two 80 gig
partitions? For the sake of my OCD would it be possible to make partition just big
enough to run windows on (with plenty of room to stretch its legs of course) then
have the second partition be storage - or would this be just as slow as one big drive
(not to mention a waste of space possibly)? Speed is more important than my system
of organization so I can cope if it'll make a noticeable difference. I guess really
what i'm asking here is --- what's the best way to approach this?
Sorry, to sound so retarded when it comes to partitioning - but like I've said I've
tried to avoid it up to this point.
|
All messages in this thread [show all]
 |  |  | re: Large drive and Win2k issues.... (2000_man: Sat, Nov 3, 2007, 11:29 am) |
| |
| |
Return to the Windows 2000 Discussion Forum
|
|
