Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 2000 Discussion Forum » Message 1198968964 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

Followup: It's the drivers, not M$
Saturday, December 29, 2007 at 2:56 pm
Windows 2000 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by DNA (553 messages posted)


The SATA drivers cannot identify which of the SATA drives you use are 'external' or 'internal' (unlike external USB drives, the eSATA drives are usually connected to the same chipset as the system's internal drives). This is a driver issue, not a Windows issue. A driver could be designed to offer the 'safely remove' option only to drives that you designate as 'external' drives, but I know of 'no such animal'... SO, since the driver cannot tell which drives are 'external', it has to offer the 'safely remove' option for all SATA drives.

Like I said, many of the older "SATA-150" motherboard/controller card chipset drivers offer no 'safely remove' option; again, this is a driver issue. The operating system used doesn't matter. My AMD 3000 has 98SE, XP Pro and Ubuntu (Linux), and to really 'safely remove' an eSATA drive in any O.S., the whole P.C. has to be shut down!

"eSATA" drives typically connect to eSATA 'brackets' fitted into PCI slots in the back of the case, said brackets connect directly to the motherboard's SATA chipset (or the SATA controller card).

Since the eSATA drives connect to the motherboard/controller card in the same manner as internal SATA drives, you have the same 'sustained' data transfer rate as the internal SATA drives. YES, you could set up an eSATA drive to be a system boot drive!

Someone will read the above and say "Aren't eSATA enclosure chipsets 'SATA-150' speed, vs. 'SATA-300' speed for a direct-connected internal drive on a newer motherboard chipset?" That's true, but the '150 MB/sec' and '300 MB/sec' speeds are BURST speeds, not SUSTAINED data transfer speeds. An eSATA-150 drive would still be 'faster' than an equivalent IDE (ATA-133/100) hard drive.

I love my eSATA drives! Two W.D. 500 GB SATA's in Vantec eSATA/USB 3.5" enclosures; they run at a consistent 3 GB+ Per Minute sustained data transfer speed :^D

----------------------------------------------------------

Athlon 3000+ 939 - 1GB RAM = 98SE (@768 MB RAM) & XP Pro SP2

Athlon 4000+X2 AM2 - 3GB RAM = 2000 SP4 & XP Pro SP2

IBM ThinkPad PIII 933 - 512 MB RAM = 98SE & XP Pro SP2

Windows 2000 Server in the basement


Written in response to:
The reason for the "Safely Remove" icon (DNA: Friday, December 28, 2007 at 4:35 pm)

Responses to this message:
*re: Followup: It's the drivers, not M$ (J.R.: Saturday, December 29, 2007 at 8:09 pm)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Sata DVD-R/RW+R/RW (J.R.: Thu, Dec 27, 2007, 5:31 pm)
-re: Sata DVD-R/RW+R/RW (Deb: Thu, Dec 27, 2007, 10:24 pm)
*re: Sata DVD-R/RW+R/RW (J.R.: Fri, Dec 28, 2007, 4:25 am)
-The reason for the "Safely Remove" icon (DNA: Fri, Dec 28, 2007, 4:35 pm)
-re: The reason for the "Safely Remove" icon (J.R.: Fri, Dec 28, 2007, 6:22 pm)
-re: The reason for the "Safely Remove" icon (Deb: Sat, Dec 29, 2007, 9:30 am)
-re: The reason for the "Safely Remove" icon (J.R.: Sat, Dec 29, 2007, 11:34 am)
-re: The reason for the "Safely Remove" icon (Deb: Sat, Dec 29, 2007, 1:08 pm)
*re: The reason for the "Safely Remove" icon (J.R.: Sat, Dec 29, 2007, 2:37 pm)
-Followup: It's the drivers, not M$ (DNA: Sat, Dec 29, 2007, 2:56 pm)
-re: Followup: It's the drivers, not M$ (J.R.: Sat, Dec 29, 2007, 8:09 pm)
*Uh oh, something's NOT M$'s fault?! (DNA: Sun, Dec 30, 2007, 1:52 pm)
Return to the Windows 2000 Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright ©1995-2012 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.