Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 2000 Discussion Forum » Message 1208880102 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

re: Svchost vague
Tuesday, April 22, 2008 at 9:01 am
Windows 2000 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by C K (6157 messages posted)


What size is the HDD and how/what size(s) is it partitioned in?  If you are dealing 
with a 48 bit LBA issue which was active on the partitions and you reinstalled W2K, 
you well may not be able to see the extended partitions.  XP with at least SP1 will 
be able to see them on install.

Not so much a reliablity issue as one of dealing with an old operating system on 
newer hardware maybe.  Many things are difficult to troubleshoot from a forum.  Would 
be easier to see if one could "get their hands on" the particular machine and software 
being used.

There are difinite do's and don'ts on W2K versus XP.  Even with SP4, W2K won't enable 
48 bit LBA automatically so if you have extended partitions and logical drives, you 
may not see them, or may/can corrupt them.  On the other hand, you can enable 48 
bit LBA in W2K and they should come back but, it is always a gamble at best so one 
should always back up the data or move it off the drive(s) until W2K and SP's are 
installed and 48 bit LBA enabled.  Then you can recreate the extended partitions 
and drives, move your data back on.  Otherwise, you may well have issues.  Slipstreaming 
SP 4 into a new install CD helps, but you still have to enable 48 bit LBA in the 
registry before you try to work beyond the 137 gig barrier in W2K.  It isn't the 
same for XP SP1/2.  MS enabled 48 bit LBA on install in SP1 and 2 for XP.

That said, you can do some "hacking" in the install registry for W2K so that 48 bit 
LBA is enabled on installation if you want and have the experience.  That probably 
would help you on the dissappearing partitions/logical drive problem for W2K IME...

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com:80/support/kb/articles/q305/0/98.asp&NoWebContent=1

And this discussion for modifying W2K and making a new install CD to see drives bigger 
than 137 gig when installing W2K:

http://msfn.modrica.com/board/lofiversion/index.php/t75713.html

There are ther guides for modifying W2K setup to recognize large disks if you Google 
for it.

48bitLBA.com has info to I believe, but not an anser to install W2K and have it recognize 
disks correctly from the installer.  MS could have made this small change and added 
it into SP3 and 4 but didn't.  :-(  Maybe for the fact that older BIOs' may not support 
it anyway..  Who knows??






On Monday, April 21, 2008 at 6:02 pm, Dave wrote:
>
>As always, thank you fine gents of Annoyances.org,
>
>Consider that over. I decided for fresh W2K, and that is what brought me never seen
>enigma. Prior of that, I've (Always use this Boot CD) used Bart PE boot disk to backup
>some important things and setups. So I did. But after W2K was finished, I can no
>longer access 2 particular partitions! They appear as uknown file system!
>
>But XP SP2, normally presents those two partitions and even more so, I can use then
>as I did before. Both NTFS to be exact. Tried all usual chkdsk routines, but really
>can't quite grasp why W2K no longer can access them. He makes them visible, but you
>can use them.
>
>I don't like this, doesn't sound reliable, and all those partitions where originally
>made with W2K.
>
>Please advise? Do I transfer all files to another drives, then again reformat those
>partitions and return data back for w2k to see those files again? Why is it that
>W2K no longer can use those?



Written in response to:
re: Svchost vague (Dave: Monday, April 21, 2008 at 6:02 pm)

Responses to this message:
*re: Svchost vague (Dave: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 at 11:19 am)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Svchost vague (Dave: Sun, Apr 20, 2008, 12:24 am)
-re: Svchost vague (C K: Sun, Apr 20, 2008, 9:00 am)
*re: Svchost vague (Dave: Sun, Apr 20, 2008, 9:09 pm)
-re: Svchost vague (DEX: Mon, Apr 21, 2008, 11:31 am)
-re: Svchost vague (Dave: Mon, Apr 21, 2008, 6:02 pm)
-re: Svchost vague (C K: Tue, Apr 22, 2008, 9:01 am)
*re: Svchost vague (Dave: Tue, Apr 22, 2008, 11:19 am)
Return to the Windows 2000 Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2008 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.