|
|
|
re: Win2K OEM vs retail
Tuesday, August 21, 2001 at 12:12 am Windows 2000 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Curt R
(1315 messages posted)
Retail or "box" versions of software usually pertain to what you buy out of the
store in a box. This is likely what you'ld be purchasing if you go out and buy it
at a store. In this case, OEM (original equipment manufacturer) tends to refer
to an operating system that was installed on your machine for you when you bought
it. I've been using 2000 for almost a year now without any real problems to speak
of. I was happy to switch over from 98 since I prefer the security and stability
of NT over the 9x. I couldn't really run the old NT 4.0 because it didn't like most
of my games and couldn't "see" FAT32. However, that's no longer a problem and I've
found it to be the most stable product MS has put out so far.
On Monday, August 20, 2001 at 3:46 pm, Dave wrote:
>Skunky,
>
>I switched from Win98 to Win 2000 about 10 months ago. Win2K is much more stable.
>I used to reboot 5-6 times a day with Win98 and now I only reboot once every other
>day. (Win98 does not manage resources very well and Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator
>and Eudora tend to make it crash often.)
>
>I have Win2K OEM. I got one CD and one book with MS hologram. That is all that is
>needed.
>
>
>,dave
- Written in response to:
- re: Win2K OEM vs retail (Dave: Monday, August 20, 2001 at 3:46 pm)
There are presently no replies to this message.
|
|
All messages in this thread [show all]
 |  |  | re: Win2K OEM vs retail (Curt R: Tue, Aug 21, 2001, 12:12 am) |
| |
| |
Return to the Windows 2000 Discussion Forum
|
|
|
|