I have a question about What's 
the difference between Windows 2000 and Windows XP?:


Microsoft claims XP is faster.  How is that possible with bloatware.  XP takes more 
memory than W2K, has more useless features, requires a faster processor, and what 
can't I do with W2K that I need to do with XP?  And then there is an exteremly-limiting 
key code for registration... come on Microsoft, who are you fooling?

So I've made my opinions clear.  Here is a more scientific study on the differences 
between XP and W2K:

http://www.infoworld.com/articles/tc/xml/01/10/29/011029tcwinxp.xml

Simpler is better.  Don't believe the hype and get the most out of your CPU.

Regards all.

• Reply or follow-up to this message

• Search this forum
• Start a new thread on a different subject

• Report abuse of the forum