|
|
|
re: Comment On 'Can't access some websites while using a shared PPPoE connection'
Thursday, March 14, 2002 at 7:58 am
Posted by Marc Sawaya
(1 messages posted)
I TOTALLY agree, I'm so happy that I can finally see all those websites now! There
were an unbelievable amount that wouldn't show up. I'm curious what MTU values other
people were coming up with, I got 1472. I have mine set up through Verizon DSL,
both comps running Win2k. Lifesaver, this article. Now I can breathe again. ;)
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: Comment On 'Can't access some websites while using a shared PPPoE connection'
Monday, April 1, 2002 at 12:06 pm
Posted by thom jefferson
(1 messages posted)
On Friday, December 7, 2001 at 2:36 pm, Greg Chila wrote:
>I think that Can't
>access some websites while using a shared PPPoE connection: is the best help
>article I've ever read. I've had this problem for months, and searched everywhere
>for the answer. I knew the answer was simple, and here it is.
>
>i keep on getting 1500 is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable
program or batch file. is this the right error message?
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: Comment On 'Can't access some websites while using a shared PPPoE connection'
Friday, July 5, 2002 at 3:32 pm
Posted by Mark Wilkins
(1 messages posted)
Hello all - Well, after three days of hacking at my Registry, changing just about
everything, I have another solution to mix into the mix:
Nothing fixed the problem, so I called Belkin, the makers of my router, to see if
they had a solution. Firmware upgrade. Three minutes later all was fixed. Sheesh
- if I restore my Registry will it break again?!?!
On Friday, December 7, 2001 at 2:36 pm, Greg Chila wrote:
>I think that Can't
>access some websites while using a shared PPPoE connection: is the best help
>article I've ever read. I've had this problem for months, and searched everywhere
>for the answer. I knew the answer was simple, and here it is.
>
>
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: Comment On 'Can't access some websites while using a shared PPPoE connection'
Friday, November 8, 2002 at 3:10 pm
Posted by Willcoom
(1 messages posted)
Brilliant thanks
On Friday, December 7, 2001 at 2:36 pm, Greg Chila wrote:
>I think that Can't
>access some websites while using a shared PPPoE connection: is the best help
>article I've ever read. I've had this problem for months, and searched everywhere
>for the answer. I knew the answer was simple, and here it is.
>
>
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
'Can't access some websites while using a shared PPPoE connection' - is awesome
Sunday, January 25, 2004 at 6:07 pm
Posted by Ganeshram Iyer
(1 messages posted)
Thanks very much for your article. Solved the problem in less than a minute.
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: 'Can't access some websites while using a shared PPPoE connection' - is awesome
Wednesday, May 12, 2004 at 8:15 am
Posted by Leon
(1 messages posted)
Great help .. but unfortunately there's still ONE website that still doesnt work
.. friendster.com ...
Anyone available for comments ?
On Sunday, January 25, 2004 at 6:07 pm, Ganeshram Iyer wrote:
>Thanks very much for your article. Solved the problem in less than a minute.
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: Comment On 'Can't access some websites while using a shared PPPoE connection'
Wednesday, December 8, 2004 at 3:20 pm
Posted by J. Pham
(1 messages posted)
Works perfectly! Well, I'm using Mac OS X, and so when I tried this on Terminal,
it didn't work. However, I used Windows 2000 on my Virtual PC, and it worked like
a charm!
By the way, the MTU that worked for me is 1472. For Mac OS X users: System Preferences
-> Network -> Configure (Ethernet connection) -> Ethernet (last tab) -> Configure
manually -> Change maximum MTU packet size to whatever works for you.
On Friday, December 7, 2001 at 2:36 pm, Greg Chila wrote:
>I think that Can't
>access some websites while using a shared PPPoE connection: is the best help
>article I've ever read. I've had this problem for months, and searched everywhere
>for the answer. I knew the answer was simple, and here it is.
>
>
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
| |
| |
Tip: Use one of the [Reply or follow-up to this message] links above to add a message to this thread
| |
Return to the Windows 2000 Discussion Forum
|
|
|
|
