Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 2000 Discussion Forum » Message 1206206211 » Entire Thread Search | Help | Home
  
FAT32 or NTFS???
Showing all messages in thread #1206206211
Windows 2000 Annoyances Discussion Forum


The following are all of the messages in this thread (4 in all), shown in chronological order. Click any message subject to view that message by itself or to view the thread hierarchy.
FAT32 or NTFS???
Saturday, March 22, 2008 at 10:16 am
Posted by Thomas (43 messages posted)

I am currently running Windows 2000 Service Pack 4 on a Pentium 2.4 GH computer with a 20 GB HD. I recently found out that the hard drive was formatted FAT32. Should I convert to NTFS? Is there any advantage to this considering my small hard drive size? Also, this is a spare computer at home. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

[Reply or follow-up to this message]

re: FAT32 or NTFS???
Saturday, March 22, 2008 at 11:59 am
Posted by DEX (11703 messages posted)

Dealing with Unwanted Spyware and Parasites

Click Here



Just let it be, once you move it up to NTFS you can't get it back to Fat32,,, it's not a big deal with that small of a HD ....

Are you a wood worker ?,if so Click Here


On Saturday, March 22, 2008 at 9:16 am, Thomas wrote:
>I am currently running Windows 2000 Service Pack 4 on a Pentium 2.4 GH computer with
>a 20 GB HD. I recently found out that the hard drive was formatted FAT32. Should
>I convert to NTFS? Is there any advantage to this considering my small hard drive
>size? Also, this is a spare computer at home. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
>Thanks in advance.

[Reply or follow-up to this message]

re: FAT32 or NTFS???
Saturday, March 22, 2008 at 2:41 pm
Posted by Alan Masterman (213 messages posted)

Yes, although NTFS is generally slightly better at everything than is FAT32, for a spare home computer with a small drive it's probably not worth making the change unless you have a specific reason to do so.

One such reason might be that you have a recurring need to copy large amounts of data from the hard drive to another drive, especially if this takes the form of copying many small files to a USB flash drive or similar (as it might if you were editing a digital photo collection, for example). In this case you would gain a spectacular improvement in read/write speeds if both drives are formatted with NTFS.


On Saturday, March 22, 2008 at 9:16 am, Thomas wrote:
>I am currently running Windows 2000 Service Pack 4 on a Pentium 2.4 GH computer with
>a 20 GB HD. I recently found out that the hard drive was formatted FAT32. Should
>I convert to NTFS? Is there any advantage to this considering my small hard drive
>size? Also, this is a spare computer at home. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
>Thanks in advance.

[Reply or follow-up to this message]

re: FAT32 or NTFS???
Monday, March 24, 2008 at 12:50 am
Posted by Geek9pm (85 messages posted)

Here is a simple explanation.

NTFS vs. FAT: Which Is Right for You

Geek9pm

[Reply or follow-up to this message]

Tip: Use one of the [Reply or follow-up to this message] links above to add a message to this thread
Return to the Windows 2000 Discussion Forum

All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2008 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.