Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 95 Discussion Forum » Message 1169519478 Search | Help | Home
  
re: removing win 95
Monday, January 22, 2007 at 6:31 pm
Windows 95 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by dhm (966 messages posted)


Yes. The Linux boot manager is called LILO (LInux LOader). You start up and it asks you for a choice of systems and if you don't select any in about a minute it will take you to Linux.

Linux always had this because it was designed as a server that could serve Macs, PCs, NeXT workstations, whatever.

Because of the GPL, Linux comes with all these utilities and you don't have to search for add-ons. Whenever someone makes an add-on for Linux, all the manufacturers put it on the next distribution.




On the subject of copying the old system, thinking back on it, when I got my Western Digital drive it came, as always, with a version of DLG, its partition and formatting programming. When I transferred Win98 to the new drive it gave me an error message that the partition wasn't big enough (even tho it was the same size). Then it did a sector by sector disk copy. So the Win98 master boot record was copied over.

The bogus error messages caused me a lot of tension but everything worked smoothly. FDISK cannot handle disks of significant size. DLG is free and it works.

Another item from a long time ago was I once tried to install Win95 on a D: drive. Theoretically that can be done. Actually it cannot. All the functions of Win95 were supposed to check the value of the environment parameter %WINDIR% but some of the Msft programmers cheated and just put in explicit "C:"s in. I know Win2K and higher can run from D:. I don't know how well Win98 can do it. But Win95 wants to be C:.

Another thing that creeped out a guy on these forums a couple years ago was that when Linux was installed Windows showed a partition with a size of zero. Some Dogbert type tried to give him advice on how to get rid of that phantom partition and I told him it was normal. The 0 length meant that Linux is formatted in such an alien way at such a low level that nothing in Windows or DOS can write anything there. So the partition is listed as having a size of zero.

I had Linux about 7 years ago but it was not ready for primetime. The only forum that I could find like this was not the equivalent. The contributors expected a $10 tip for advice such as I just gave you for free. Msft was not exaggerating then when it said Linux started free but quickly the TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) exceeded Windows. I'm sure it will be better for you now.


On Monday, January 22, 2007 at 12:33 pm, driver wrote:
>And how does one choose which to boot from. Wil there be a screen with a choice at
>start up like when windows has two accounts ?
>
>
>


Written in response to:
re: removing win 95 (driver: Monday, January 22, 2007 at 12:33 pm)

Responses to this message:
*re: removing win 95 (driver: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 at 11:24 am)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-removing win 95 (driver: Sat, Jan 20, 2007, 8:54 am)
-re: removing win 95 (Keith Stanier: Sat, Jan 20, 2007, 2:08 pm)
-re: removing win 95 (dhm: Sat, Jan 20, 2007, 7:56 pm)
-re: removing win 95 (driver: Sun, Jan 21, 2007, 6:27 am)
-re: removing win 95 (dhm: Mon, Jan 22, 2007, 4:10 am)
-re: removing win 95 (Benoit: Mon, Jan 22, 2007, 9:24 am)
*re: removing win 95 (driver: Mon, Jan 22, 2007, 10:29 am)
-re: removing win 95 (dhm: Mon, Jan 22, 2007, 11:18 am)
-re: removing win 95 (driver: Mon, Jan 22, 2007, 12:33 pm)
-re: removing win 95 (dhm: Mon, Jan 22, 2007, 6:31 pm)
*re: removing win 95 (driver: Tue, Jan 23, 2007, 11:24 am)
Return to the Windows 95 Discussion Forum

All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2008 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.