Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 98 Discussion Forum » Message 1020192825 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

re: The little arrows are back to stay
Tuesday, April 30, 2002 at 11:53 am
Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by tchused (1 messages posted)





On Sunday, March 17, 2002 at 11:35 am, Mark wrote:
>Microsoft destroyed the best feature of TweakUI on March 7, 2002.
>TweakUI>Explorer>Shortcut (Arrow) Overlay choices were rendered useless.
> This problem is caused by the installation of "Windows 98 Q313829 Update" covered
>in Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-014, both available at the Microsoft Update website.
>This update covers a problem of low risk for most home users, and I would recommend
>NOT installing it, unless you don't care about icon shortcut arrows.
>If you already have: The only fix that worked for me (and I tried them all) was Galaxy
>Master's, since there were no values in my registry under "IsShortcut" in Larry's
>fix.
>I have notified Microsoft Support, so they may be able to correct and reissue this
>update in the future.
>One can only hope. I am surprised that Microsoft hackers didn't catch this. Maybe
>that is why stocks rise and FALL!
>There are now millions of ticked-off icon-shortcut-arrow-haters out there, so whoever
>signs-off Microsoft security updates in the future should be thinking if they wish
>to remain employed.
>
>


Written in response to:
re: The little arrows are back to stay (Mark: Sunday, March 17, 2002 at 11:35 am)

There are presently no replies to this message.

All messages in this thread [show all]
-The little arrows are back to stay (Laura: Fri, Mar 8, 2002, 10:53 am)
-re: The little arrows are back to stay (Larry: Fri, Mar 8, 2002, 11:30 am)
*re: The little arrows are back to stay (Laura: Mon, Mar 11, 2002, 6:00 am)
*re: The little arrows are back to stay (Cliff Treadway: Tue, May 20, 2003, 1:28 pm)
-re: The little arrows are back to stay (Thomas: Fri, Mar 8, 2002, 12:19 pm)
*re: The little arrows are back to stay (Larry: Fri, Mar 8, 2002, 1:09 pm)
-re: The little arrows are back to stay (GM: Fri, Mar 8, 2002, 2:54 pm)
*re: The little arrows are back to stay (Ron: Fri, Mar 8, 2002, 3:49 pm)
*re: The little arrows are back to stay (Thomas: Sat, Mar 9, 2002, 12:47 pm)
*re: The little arrows are back to stay (Tony Solomon: Fri, Oct 10, 2003, 10:53 am)
*re:What else?? (gord: Fri, Mar 8, 2002, 3:27 pm)
-re: The little arrows are back to stay (Mark: Sun, Mar 17, 2002, 11:35 am)
*re: The little arrows are back to stay (tchused: Tue, Apr 30, 2002, 11:53 am)
-re: The little arrows are back to stay (Kenny: Mon, May 6, 2002, 6:06 pm)
*re: The little arrows are back to stay (Lee: Sat, Jul 20, 2002, 7:05 pm)
-re: The little arrows are back to stay (Veronica Nunez: Sun, Aug 11, 2002, 6:03 am)
-re: The little arrows are back to stay (Chuck: Sun, Sep 8, 2002, 6:27 pm)
*re: The little arrows are back to stay (jw rebel: Tue, Apr 1, 2003, 8:58 am)
-re: The little arrows are back to stay (lando: Tue, Dec 24, 2002, 9:17 am)
*re: The little arrows are back to stay (Erin: Mon, Feb 24, 2003, 5:46 pm)
*re: The little arrows are back to stay (Warrior: Sun, Mar 21, 2004, 3:17 pm)
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2009 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.