Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 98 Discussion Forum » Message 1043176991 Search | Help | Home
  
re: not IRQ 9 its IRQ 2/9
Tuesday, January 21, 2003 at 11:23 am
Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Brennan (1 messages posted)


you mite want to watch how u say IRQ 9, there is no IRQ 9 its IRQ 2/9


On Thursday, July 11, 2002 at 7:51 pm, Everett wrote:
>Johan:  Glad to help out.  WinXP handles IRQs differently, as you found out:
>
>It is normal behavior for PCI devices to have IRQs shared among them, especially 
>on Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) computers that have Windows 
>ACPI support enabled. 
>
>In Windows XP, Device Manager may list some or all of the devices on your ACPI motherboard 
>as using the same IRQ (IRQ 9). (To view the list of resources, click either Resources 
>by type or Resources by connection on the View menu). No option is available to 
change 
>the IRQ setting.
> 
>Windows takes advantage of the ACPI features of the motherboard, including advanced 
>PCI sharing. The PCI bus uses IRQ 9 for IRQ steering. This feature lets you add 
more 
>devices without generating IRQ conflicts. 
>
>Note that Windows XP cannot rebalance resources in the same way that Microsoft Windows 
>98 does. After PCI resources are set, they generally cannot be changed. 
>
>If you change to an invalid IRQ setting or I/O range for the bus that a device is 
>on, Windows XP cannot compensate by rebalancing the resource that was assigned to 
>that bus. 
>
>Windows XP does not have this ability because of the more complex hardware schemas 
>that Windows XP is designed to support.
>
>Windows 98 does not have to support IOAPICs, multiple root PCI buses, multiple-processor 
>systems, and so on. When you are dealing with these hardware schemas, rebalancing 
>becomes risky and therefore is not implemented in Windows XP except for very specific 
>scenarios. 
>
>PCI devices are required to be able to share IRQs. In general, the ability to share 
>IRQs does not prevent any hardware from working. 
>
>The above is courtesy of article Q314068
>




Written in response to:
re: IRQs in WinXP (Everett: Thursday, July 11, 2002 at 7:51 pm)

There are presently no replies to this message.

All messages in this thread [show all]
-IRQ assignments depend on OS? (Johan B: Tue, Jul 9, 2002, 12:50 am)
-re: IRQ Sharing (Everett: Tue, Jul 9, 2002, 6:58 pm)
-Thanks, works for me! (Johan B: Thu, Jul 11, 2002, 12:11 am)
-re: IRQs in WinXP (Everett: Thu, Jul 11, 2002, 7:51 pm)
*re: not IRQ 9 its IRQ 2/9 (Brennan: Tue, Jan 21, 2003, 11:23 am)
-re: IRQ Sharing (STELE E: Fri, Jul 9, 2004, 10:00 pm)
-re: IRQ Sharing (Everett: Sat, Jul 10, 2004, 6:44 am)
*re: IRQ Sharing (STELE E: Sat, Jul 10, 2004, 11:07 pm)
-re: Win98SE seeing Com3 NOT during modem install (Randy Ohman: Fri, Sep 3, 2004, 10:01 pm)
*re: Win98SE seeing Com3 NOT during modem install (Randy Ohman: Sat, Sep 4, 2004, 11:29 am)
-re: IRQ assignments depend on OS? (dave stierle: Sun, Dec 15, 2002, 8:27 pm)
-re: IRQ assignments (Everett: Tue, Jan 21, 2003, 12:44 pm)
-re: IRQ assignments (lynn: Sun, Jan 26, 2003, 4:14 am)
-re: IRQ assignments (Everett: Sun, Jan 26, 2003, 2:58 pm)
-re: IRQ assignments (lynn: Tue, Jan 28, 2003, 2:01 pm)
*re: IRQ steering (Everett: Tue, Jan 28, 2003, 5:35 pm)
-re: IRQ assignments (Ep: Fri, Jan 31, 2003, 10:49 pm)
-re: IRQ assignments (Everett: Sat, Feb 1, 2003, 8:11 pm)
-re: IRQ assignments (STU: Mon, Feb 2, 2004, 6:54 am)
*re: IRQ assignments (Everett: Tue, Feb 3, 2004, 8:35 am)
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum

All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2008 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.