|
|
|
re: not IRQ 9 its IRQ 2/9
Tuesday, January 21, 2003 at 11:23 am Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Brennan
(1 messages posted)
you mite want to watch how u say IRQ 9, there is no IRQ 9 its IRQ 2/9
On Thursday, July 11, 2002 at 7:51 pm, Everett wrote:
>Johan: Glad to help out. WinXP handles IRQs differently, as you found out:
>
>It is normal behavior for PCI devices to have IRQs shared among them, especially
>on Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) computers that have Windows
>ACPI support enabled.
>
>In Windows XP, Device Manager may list some or all of the devices on your ACPI motherboard
>as using the same IRQ (IRQ 9). (To view the list of resources, click either Resources
>by type or Resources by connection on the View menu). No option is available to
change
>the IRQ setting.
>
>Windows takes advantage of the ACPI features of the motherboard, including advanced
>PCI sharing. The PCI bus uses IRQ 9 for IRQ steering. This feature lets you add
more
>devices without generating IRQ conflicts.
>
>Note that Windows XP cannot rebalance resources in the same way that Microsoft Windows
>98 does. After PCI resources are set, they generally cannot be changed.
>
>If you change to an invalid IRQ setting or I/O range for the bus that a device is
>on, Windows XP cannot compensate by rebalancing the resource that was assigned to
>that bus.
>
>Windows XP does not have this ability because of the more complex hardware schemas
>that Windows XP is designed to support.
>
>Windows 98 does not have to support IOAPICs, multiple root PCI buses, multiple-processor
>systems, and so on. When you are dealing with these hardware schemas, rebalancing
>becomes risky and therefore is not implemented in Windows XP except for very specific
>scenarios.
>
>PCI devices are required to be able to share IRQs. In general, the ability to share
>IRQs does not prevent any hardware from working.
>
>The above is courtesy of article Q314068
>
- Written in response to:
- re: IRQs in WinXP (Everett: Thursday, July 11, 2002 at 7:51 pm)
There are presently no replies to this message.
|
|
All messages in this thread [show all]
 |  |  |  |  | re: not IRQ 9 its IRQ 2/9 (Brennan: Tue, Jan 21, 2003, 11:23 am) |
| |
| |
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum
|
|
|
|