Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 98 Discussion Forum » Message 1052429698 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

re: For those running 95 and 98: Keep these files
Thursday, May 8, 2003 at 2:34 pm
Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Cam (4178 messages posted)


Thank you Phoenix, I wonder if you have seen this article. How would this affect 
the files, buffers and stacks settings? See below. These apply to ME too.

HOW TO TROUBLESHOOT WINDOWS INTERNAL STACK OVERFLOW ERROR MESSAGES Q145799

STACKS=64,512 ;(this is the maximum allowed)
FILES=60
BUFFERS=40

Do you agree?

I found this to be a good accompanyment to the article above, and usually apply them 
at the same time.

ERROR MESSAGE: THERE ARE NO SPARE STACK PAGES Q149083

Makes you wonder why MS does not include known improvements in a system up-date.

Just to say that you should use the check-box below the compose window to preserve 
your spacing. If you would like to repost then it is a good posting to make a link 
to.

Mac




On Thursday, May 8, 2003 at 12:07 pm, Phoenix wrote: I have a question about, "Do I still need CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT?" Keep these files around, and put something similar into them. Windows 95 and 98 still rely on DOS to do a lot of things, and tuning these files appropriately can actually improve stability and performance in Windows applications. config.sys: device=c:\windows\himem.sys /testmem:off device=c:\windows\emm386.exe noems dos=high,umb fileshigh=40 buffershigh=40 stackshigh=9,256 fcbshigh=16,8 lastdrivehigh=z devicehigh=c:\windows\ifshlp.sys devicehigh=c:\windows\setver.exe autoexec.bat: @echo off set path=c:\windows\command;c:\windows;c:\ set dircmd=/o:ge /p set temp=c:\windows\temp set tmp=c:\windows\tmp loadhigh c:\windows\command\doskey.com /insert What do these settings do?? These are based on the defaults that windows uses, but puts everything into High Memory, giving you more Conventional Memory, better stability, and greater performance where Windows is concerned. Remember, Windows 95, 98, and ME are nothing more than graphical shells for DOS 7.x. To test the difference this makes, open a DOS prompt and type: mem /c Write down the numbers listed under the FREE column in the memory summary. Make the changes above and reboot. Type: mem /c again and compare the values. More FREE memory means better performance from Windows 95 and 98. This is not needed on NT-based Windows (NT, 2000, XP) as they are not based on DOS.



Written in response to:
For those running 95 and 98: Keep these files (Phoenix: Thursday, May 8, 2003 at 12:07 pm)

There are presently no replies to this message.

All messages in this thread [show all]
-For those running 95 and 98: Keep these files (Phoenix: Thu, May 8, 2003, 12:07 pm)
*re: For those running 95 and 98: Keep these files (WhitPhil: Thu, May 8, 2003, 12:39 pm)
*re: For those running 95 and 98: Keep these files (Cam: Thu, May 8, 2003, 2:34 pm)
*re: For those running 95 and 98: Keep these files (DethBlade: Fri, May 6, 2005, 6:19 pm)
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2009 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.