Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 98 Discussion Forum » Message 1096128433 Search | Help | Home
  
re: Question about 'Do I still need CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT?'
Saturday, September 25, 2004 at 9:07 am
Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Spike01 (328 messages posted)


Mark, NOT The CPU (Processor)....

The chipset is the "Other Chips" that communicate with
the processor.

Disregaurd the whole message of the Harddisk(s).
It isn't because of the harddisk(s).  they are small, I must have been a little groggy 
when I answered the
question, and didn't read it correctly.

Look for the chips that are soldered onto the board.
They are usually square or rectangular.

If you do a search for chipset on the net, you should
be able to see a description.  Better yet, look for the
Number, usually in what looks like a taped-over, white
area,  with a number, on your motherboard.  Do a search
on that number, you will probably find the maker of the
motherboard and whole pages devoted to your MOB.
Most MOB makers have updates,
(like the ones you are looking for), and .pdf's for the users like us.  The  .pdf's 
 will/should tell you everything
you need to know about your motherboard, including
amount of RAM you can use, how to set the switches,(jumpers), BIOS Settings, et. 
cetera.

Please don't remove the processor when not needed.







On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 9:13 am, marc paskvan wrote:
>Well, thanks Spike. I see though, that I'm going to have to take the fan off the
>processor--looks like there's a clip of some sort on it. Then I'll check it out.
> But I thought, that since it's a Cyrix, Mark 2; that Cyrix got bought out by some
>other manufacturer...well, I suppose I'll find out soon enuf, if I try and Google
>it.
>I'm not sure what you mean by your second point though. Anyway, it may be that this
>motherboard doesn't support large drives--at least not larger than the measly 2.1
>gig drive they installed. Arg. In that case it's 'trade-up time'....
>
>Marc



Written in response to:
re: Question about 'Do I still need CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT?' (marc paskvan: Friday, September 24, 2004 at 9:13 am)

Responses to this message:
*re: Question about 'Do I still need CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT?' (marc paskvan: Monday, September 27, 2004 at 9:48 am)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Question about 'Do I still need CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT?' (marc paskvan: Tue, Sep 21, 2004, 10:16 am)
-re: Question about 'Do I still need CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT?' (Spike01: Wed, Sep 22, 2004, 10:23 pm)
-re: Question about 'Do I still need CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT?' (marc paskvan: Fri, Sep 24, 2004, 9:13 am)
-re: Question about 'Do I still need CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT?' (Spike01: Sat, Sep 25, 2004, 9:07 am)
-re: Question about 'Do I still need CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT?' (marc paskvan: Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 9:48 am)
-re: Question about 'Do I still need CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT?' (marc paskvan: Mon, Sep 27, 2004, 2:18 pm)
-re: Question about 'Do I still need CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT?' (Spike01: Tue, Sep 28, 2004, 3:20 am)
-re: Question about 'Do I still need CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT?' (marc paskvan: Tue, Sep 28, 2004, 10:15 am)
-re: Question about 'Do I still need CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT?' (marc paskvan: Wed, Sep 29, 2004, 10:19 am)
-re: Question about 'Do I still need CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT?' (Spike01: Thu, Sep 30, 2004, 12:38 am)
-re: Question about 'Do I still need CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT?' (marc paskvan: Thu, Sep 30, 2004, 9:31 am)
*re: Question about 'Do I still need CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT?' (marc paskvan: Wed, Oct 6, 2004, 10:11 am)
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum

All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2008 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.