Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 98 Discussion Forum » Message 1126328779 Search | Help | Home
  
re: Extended RAM failed at offset 1A
Friday, September 9, 2005 at 10:06 pm
Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Loc Long (2 messages posted)


Hey C.K You're absolutely correct !. I got a new 16-chip stick , PC133 and it works just fine now (all total 320M of SDRAM...the wife loves the surfing now !). I didn't have to upgrade or change anything in BIOS or move the sticks around in different banks. The returned RAM didn't have any problems either as it was tested in the store PC and it came up fine (4 chip, double side). I took your advice and got new stick even though the sale guys who sold me the stuff didn't know whether it would work...He suggested to bring the PC in for them to check (charge ~ $45)....I said no-thank and took a chance with the new stick. Also did chat with the HP support tech last night before posted the question on this forum and the person was clueless. First of all the person told me the PC doesn't support PC133 , then retracted and apologized after I sent the PC specs. Then the person told me it's a bad mem and the solution is get a new one and make sure I don't run the two memory sticks together...I'm in tech support also and completely PC illiterate but the support was bad !. Sorry about the rant Again thank you for taking time to answer my questions. Cheers Loc


On Thursday, September 8, 2005 at 9:26 pm, C K wrote:
>This is the correct spec for your system and it is double sided LD. This is a 256
>module:
>
>http://www.crucial.com/store/MPartspecs.Asp?mtbpoid=1FD50B59A5CA7304&WSMD=Pavilion+8750C&WSPN=CT187297#info
>
>When you take the new module back, make sure this is the spec you get. If they can't
>verify what they are selling you, go some place that can. Note, in the above page
>link two of the spec listings. CL-2 and the 32 X 64.. The 64 number can NOT be
>any higher. If it is, it's wrong for your computer. Also check HP's website that
>no BIOS update is necessary to run the full capacity of RAM. Sometimes the BIOS
>needed to be upgraded for early versions of the same computer model series. Good
>Luck!! :-)
>
>
>


Written in response to:
re: Extended RAM failed at offset 1A (C K: Thursday, September 8, 2005 at 9:26 pm)

Responses to this message:
*re: Extended RAM failed at offset 1A (C K: Sunday, September 11, 2005 at 2:03 pm)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Extended RAM failed at offset 1A (Loc Long: Thu, Sep 8, 2005, 8:21 pm)
*re: Extended RAM failed at offset 1A (C K: Thu, Sep 8, 2005, 9:03 pm)
-re: Extended RAM failed at offset 1A (C K: Thu, Sep 8, 2005, 9:26 pm)
-re: Extended RAM failed at offset 1A (Loc Long: Fri, Sep 9, 2005, 10:06 pm)
*re: Extended RAM failed at offset 1A (C K: Sun, Sep 11, 2005, 2:03 pm)
*One correction... (C K: Fri, Sep 9, 2005, 10:18 am)
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum

All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2008 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.