re: Digital Photo Discs won't "mount". Tuesday, January 3, 2006 at 4:20 pm Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum Posted by gewg_ (4444 messages posted) |Media should be multi-archived as soon as possible |and duplicated to new media every few years to protect from loss. | C K | It can't be said often enough. |If the laser is weak and was trying to write discs, |they may be readable and then start failing. | It has always seemed intuutive to me that the slowest burning speed available will give the most reliable results. Can anyone point to something empirical that supports this (or shoots holes in it)? Written in response to: re: Digital Photo Discs won't "mount". (C K: Tuesday, January 3, 2006 at 2:31 pm) Responses to this message: re: Digital Photo Discs won't "mount". (C K: Wednesday, January 4, 2006 at 11:28 am) All messages in this thread [show all] Digital Photo Discs won't "mount". (Allan J.: Mon, Jan 2, 2006, 10:54 am) re: Digital Photo Discs won't "mount". (C K: Tue, Jan 3, 2006, 2:31 pm) re: Digital Photo Discs won't "mount". (gewg_: Tue, Jan 3, 2006, 4:20 pm) re: Digital Photo Discs won't "mount". (C K: Wed, Jan 4, 2006, 11:28 am) re: Digital Photo Discs won't "mount". (Allan J.: Fri, Jan 6, 2006, 8:33 pm) re: Digital Photo Discs won't "mount". (C K: Sun, Jan 8, 2006, 12:47 pm) Reply or follow-up to this message Search this forum Start a new thread on a different subject Report abuse of the forum Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum