re: Is W98 secure ? Saturday, August 18, 2007 at 8:49 am Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum Posted by Kiwi (2111 messages posted) I wouldn't describe any MS Windows version as adequately secure for much of anything critical, although by virtue of being a far less complex and overbloated product, it never had anything like the number of holes that XP has. Your final shot totally misses my radar. All I can think of is a cartoon bear . . . Kiwi ** On Friday, August 17, 2007 at 6:08 pm, BM wrote: >Does W98 have internal security functions, e.g. host defences ? Are there still exploits >in windows 98 itself which have not been patched by MS? If this is the case can I >obtain a path elsewhere from MS?..and finally would W98 be an ideal OS to use as >a honey pot? Written in response to: Is W98 secure by default? (BM: Friday, August 17, 2007 at 6:08 pm) There are presently no replies to this message. All messages in this thread [show all] Is W98 secure by default? (BM: Fri, Aug 17, 2007, 6:08 pm) re: Is W98 secure ? (Kiwi: Sat, Aug 18, 2007, 8:49 am) re: Is W98 secure by default? (Steve: Sat, Aug 18, 2007, 10:41 am) Ideal "Honey Pot": Windows XP Gold (DNA: Sat, Aug 18, 2007, 6:10 pm) re: Is W98 secure by default? (dhm: Mon, Aug 20, 2007, 11:47 am) re: Is W98 more secure than a WinNT version? (Kiwi: Mon, Aug 20, 2007, 2:04 pm) Reply or follow-up to this message Search this forum Start a new thread on a different subject Report abuse of the forum Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum