Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 98 Discussion Forum » Message 1191687833 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

re: Win9x (Max) RAM
Saturday, October 6, 2007 at 9:23 am
Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Kiwi (2228 messages posted)


Most of the time when I am dual booting between W98 and Win2K, and want a GB of RAM in the machine, I am installing W98 first, and leave out the second DIMM for the initial steps, but at least once I was able to complete almost an entire install (with the pair of 512 DIMMs in place) before I had to deal with the Vcache setting. I have no idea what made that system an exception.

Only once, among half a dozen systems, plus or minus, on which I was dealing with the 512 MB barrier, have I had to tell the system it didn't have a GB after all. That one needed both the Vcache setting, and a 768 MB limit setting.

.

Kiwi

**


On Saturday, October 6, 2007 at 8:18 am, DNA wrote:
>PS: Win9x won't even run at all if there is 2 GB or more of physical RAM installed,
>because 2 GB of total memory (swap file and physical memory combined) is all that
>Win9x can address, and unfortunately Windows is designed to work with a large swap
>file (or 'page file') on the hard drive (and this is even more accentuated under
>Windows NT versions, such as 2000 and XP). Even more fun is Linux, which demands
>a Swapfile partition (which would actually be the best idea for Windows, as
>well!)
>


>Funny how your machine would only go in Safe Mode (with the 1 GB stick installed),
>I would have to remove one of the 512 MB RAM sticks to get my Athlon 3000 machine
>to boot in Win98 Safe Mode!
>


>I was able to get a 1 GB RAM machine to boot in Win98 Safe Mode once, because this
>machine had 64 MB of the system RAM allocated to onboard video, so Win98 saw '960
>MB' of RAM. I still had to use the MaxPhysPage line in System.ini, because
>at '960 MB' of RAM, it had strange side effects, such as no browser being able to
>connect to the Internet (IE, Firefox, Opera), which were immediately fixed when MaxPhysPage
>was set to '30000' (768 MB) and the system was rebooted. It's still running fine
>for its owner a year later...
>


>If you're building a Win9x box with something like a Socket 754 AMD / Socket 775
>Intel budget Mainboard/CPU combo (with only AGP and PCI slots, of course!), the board
>likely won't have 'dual-channel' RAM, so you can get one 512 stick and one 256 stick,
>and have 768 MB of RAM (enough to run Win XP or Linux well, for 'dual-boot' systems...)
>


>----------------------------------------------------------


Written in response to:
Win9x RAM (DNA: Saturday, October 6, 2007 at 8:18 am)

There are presently no replies to this message.

All messages in this thread [show all]
-RAM upgrade problem (David C.: Fri, Oct 5, 2007, 5:42 pm)
-re: RAM upgrade problem (gewg_: Fri, Oct 5, 2007, 8:04 pm)
-Win9x RAM (DNA: Sat, Oct 6, 2007, 8:18 am)
*re: Win9x (Max) RAM (Kiwi: Sat, Oct 6, 2007, 9:23 am)
*re: RAM upgrade problem (Joe Hepperle: Sat, Oct 6, 2007, 4:20 pm)
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright ©1995-2012 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.