re: RUNDLL error on start up
Thursday, October 11, 2007 at 12:42 pm
Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Joe Hepperle
(73 messages posted)
Hi again Ms Eagle:
Wow! Another compliment! Thank you for putting me in the ALL-Stars league.
Count ANOTHER trophy on my mantle! Maybe I should start collecting heads?
LINK Rundll,
LINK Mike,
LINK Runsan,
LINK i.e. internet
troll.
But don't forget
LINK JazzMan,
and
LINK Charlie,
and
LINK Joe Hepperle
Sorry about not getting back sooner. I was busy researching.
I was sitting here ruminating about how you use multiple identities, but you and
"gewg" seem to operate from the same script. He's mean, you're mean, he's sometimes
helpful, you're sometimes helpful, he frequently posts when he doesn't know the answer,
you frequently post when you don't know the answer. Then I thought about how You
always conveniently appear when "gewg" gets stressed and pressed.
You claim that "gewg" didn't summon you, but unfortunately, you and "gewg" have a
history of this. You did it here, and you've done it before.
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/forum/win98/1165695566
It seems you are mysteriously "summoned" when "gewg" can't stand the heat.
It's the same scenario. A fellow is busy trading posts with "gewg" and then in a
split-second shift, all of a sudden you are the one responding. It is so noticeable
that even he asked the same question, "Can't "gewg" answer for himself?"
And for the remainder of the post, "gewg" is suppressed while Ms Eagle, or Bald Eagle,
or Carol, or Sybil finishes out the thread.
Why did Kevin, at this post say you needed psycological help?
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/forum/winxp/1144109706
I thought that was all pretty strange and it was just a collection of odd bits floating
around in my head -- until now in this post.
It all came together and "clicked" when I re-read the part you wrote,
"We aren't playing your game"
So I was doing research on MPD-DID
It's okay Carol... I understand now.
I understand how "malware" is whatever you say it is.
I understand how you can claim that this web page
here proves that NewDotNet is malware, even though
it says nothing of the kind.
- http://cexx.org/newnet.htm
I understand how you can look at this Letter from Cexx
to NewDotNet, read about all the retractions they had to make,
but yet claim they made no retractions.
- http://cexx.org/newdotresponse.htm
And I understand how, to you, no matter how much proof
from me you receive, it "...changes nothing...", in your eyes.
It's okay Carol... Ms Eagle... Bald Eagle... Gewg... I understand now... ... ...
...
Joe Hepperle
|
All messages in this thread [show all]
 | | | | |  | re: RUNDLL error on start up (Joe Hepperle: Thu, Oct 11, 2007, 12:42 pm) |
| |
| |
| |
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum
|
|
