Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 98 Discussion Forum » Message 1235114401 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

Can't play Flash media at YouTube with my TERRIFIC new Firefox browser
Thursday, February 19, 2009 at 11:20 pm
Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by gewg_ (3936 messages posted)


Kit wrote:
|I've installed Firefox, AND IT ROCKS! [...]
|
Yup.  The infection-prone thing that M$ slopped together[1] last century
can't hold a candle to 21st-Century browsers.

Even IE7 (which M$ purposely crippled for Win9x) is pretty crappy WRT standards.
The European Union's lawsuit against Micros~1 may finally force them
(for the first time) to a state of quasi-compliance with W3C standards in IE8.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://microsoft.com

|I do have one teeny problem, tho [...]Youtube
|
First, recognize that this is a Windows 98 forum
and that things that don't install from the Windows CD are really off-topic here.

That said, replacing IE solves about 93% of all Windoze-related problems,
so we'll let it slide this one time.
If you're going to continue to use a Mozilla product, however,
you should get cozy with a corresponding Mozilla Usenet group and/or forum.

Now, recognize that a Web browser is a tool for rendering HTML.
*.FLV / *.SWF are NOT part of the HTML specification.[2] 
cache of http://filext.com/file-extension/FLV
To get those kind of unsupported things to play "inside" your Web browser,
you need
1) the proper "Helper Application" (Shockwave/Flash)

2) a plug-in that corresponds to the browser and that app. 
cache of http://plugindoc.mozdev.org/windows-all.html#Flash


[1] Actually, M$ got rights to it from Spyglass Inc.,
screwed that company financially, then took over their browser
and renamed it before turning it into an even bigger steaming pile of insecurity.

[2] There is a new {video} tag in HTML5 that would make all of this moot,
but if M$ doesn't support it in IE8, it will be stillborn.
IE is currently losing ~2% of the browser market per year,
but it's still got 88% by some counts.




Written in response to:
re: Firefox - TERRIFIC! But One Little Problem (Follow-Up) (Kit: Thursday, February 19, 2009 at 8:23 pm)

Responses to this message:
*Follow Up: Firefox Problem Solved Without Linux! Was My question Off-Topic? (Kit: Friday, February 20, 2009 at 2:43 pm)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Which Firefox for Installing on 98SE? (Kit: Thu, Feb 19, 2009, 2:48 pm)
-re: Which Firefox for Installing on 98SE? (Steve: Thu, Feb 19, 2009, 3:04 pm)
-re: Which Firefox for Installing on 98SE? (Kit: Thu, Feb 19, 2009, 3:21 pm)
-re: Which Firefox for Installing on 98SE? (Steve: Thu, Feb 19, 2009, 3:45 pm)
*re: Which Firefox for Installing on 98SE? (gewg_: Thu, Feb 19, 2009, 5:57 pm)
-re: Firefox - TERRIFIC! But One Little Problem (Follow-Up) (Kit: Thu, Feb 19, 2009, 8:23 pm)
-Can't play Flash media at YouTube with my TERRIFIC new Firefox browser (gewg_: Thu, Feb 19, 2009, 11:20 pm)
-Follow Up: Firefox Problem Solved Without Linux! Was My question Off-Topic? (Kit: Fri, Feb 20, 2009, 2:43 pm)
*re: Follow Up: Firefox Problem Solved Without Linux! Was My question Off-Topic? (Ms. Eagle: Fri, Feb 20, 2009, 5:00 pm)
-re: Follow Up: Firefox Problem Solved Without Linux! Was My question Off-Topic? (gewg_: Fri, Feb 20, 2009, 5:43 pm)
-re: Follow Up: Firefox Problem Solved Without Linux! Was My question Off-Topic? (Ms. Eagle: Fri, Feb 20, 2009, 7:27 pm)
-re: Follow Up: Firefox Problem Solved Without Linux! Was My question Off-Topic? (gewg_: Fri, Feb 20, 2009, 7:42 pm)
*re: Follow Up: Firefox Problem Solved Without Linux! Was My question Off-Topic? (Ms. Eagle: Fri, Feb 20, 2009, 9:12 pm)
-re: Follow Up: Firefox Problem Solved Without Linux! Was My question Off-Topic? (Steve: Fri, Feb 20, 2009, 5:46 pm)
*re: Thanks to All for Topic Clarification (Kit: Sun, Mar 8, 2009, 8:41 am)
-re: Which Firefox for Installing on 98SE? (runsan: Sun, Mar 1, 2009, 4:36 pm)
-As usual, "runsan" has no clue. (gewg_: Mon, Mar 2, 2009, 5:24 pm)
-re: As usual, "runsan" has no clue. (runsan: Tue, Mar 3, 2009, 1:16 pm)
-re: As usual, "runsan" has no clue. (gewg_: Tue, Mar 3, 2009, 5:11 pm)
-re: As usual, "runsan" has no clue. (runsan: Sun, Jun 28, 2009, 5:33 pm)
-re: As usual, "runsan" has no clue (especially WRT Internet Exploder) (gewg_: Mon, Jun 29, 2009, 11:27 am)
*re: As usual, "runsan" has no clue (especially WRT Internet Exploder) (runsan: Wed, Jul 1, 2009, 1:21 am)
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2009 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.