Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 98 Discussion Forum » Message 1242330339 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

re: 512 sdram
Thursday, May 14, 2009 at 12:45 pm
Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by C K (6528 messages posted)


Exactly what brand name and model number is the computer or the motherboard??  Knowing 
the chip specs won't help if we don't know what machine or motherboard they are going 
into.  Hardware questions are really off topic here but we try if we know and can 
give a quick answer.

Dual channel ready isn't the old first generation SDRAM types as there were no dual 
channel boards for the old SDRAM, so we might not be thinking on the same terms! 
 Dual channel ready is the newer SDRAM which is also DDR, DDR2 and the newer DDR3 
type.  Many people don't realize DDR "IS" SDRAM but an upgraded and faster version. 
 DDR is also keyed differently and won't fit in the original SDRAM slots, so if it 
says, dual channel ready, it is has to be DDR ram or it is mislabeled/misrepresented.

The old SDRAM is all but impossible to find and will be more costly than DDR RAM, 
if you can find it, and will in all likelyhood be used as it hasn't been manufactured 
in years!

All that being said, you have to check the size limits and configuration restrictions 
of the machine or the motherboard, as hardware manufacturers customize them to different 
support levels, mostly to make cheaper boards, especially for the big OEM companies. 
 The BIOS is also customized to fit these machines and/or motherboards.  If you have 
4 machines that act the same, then you have a hardware issue that only the manufacturer 
could help you with, or give you info on what the machine of the motherboard will 
support.

Websites like Crucial or Kingston will have a tool to let you know what memory you 
need and the maximum amounts on a system or motherboard, unless it is a very obscure 
and unpopular model.



Written in response to:
re: 512 sdram (chad: Thursday, May 14, 2009 at 11:52 am)

Responses to this message:
*re: 512 MB sdram vs. MB Chipset BIOS (Kiwi: Thursday, June 11, 2009 at 10:30 am)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-512 sdram (chad: Wed, May 13, 2009, 5:57 pm)
-re: 512 sdram (Steve: Wed, May 13, 2009, 6:37 pm)
-re: 512 sdram (DanTheMan: Wed, May 13, 2009, 11:40 pm)
*re: 512 sdram (Steve: Thu, May 14, 2009, 6:26 am)
-re: 512 sdram (C K: Thu, May 14, 2009, 6:39 am)
-re: 512 sdram (chad: Thu, May 14, 2009, 11:52 am)
-re: 512 sdram (C K: Thu, May 14, 2009, 12:45 pm)
*re: 512 MB sdram vs. MB Chipset BIOS (Kiwi: Thu, Jun 11, 2009, 10:30 am)
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2009 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.