Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 98 Discussion Forum » Message 1253151986 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

An OS that doesn't require activation (was:...XP...)
Wednesday, September 16, 2009 at 6:46 pm
Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by gewg_ (4444 messages posted)


Alan wrote:
|Guess I should have said:
|I would appreciate you suggesting one or two versions of Linux for me to try.
|The dummy versions :-))

Why does no one mention how much horsepower he has?  8-(
How much RAM you have matters (especially assuming Win9x-era hardware).

With at least 256MB:

Linux Mint is the Cadillac.
It comes with all the proprietary crap--even some that Windoze doesn't include:
(That's a BIG plus--especially for those with limited bandwidth.)
cache 
of  http://sheehantu.wordpress.com/category/tips

The default version of Mint uses the Gnome desktop.
A lot of (former) Windoze users prefer the K Desktop Environment.
Mint does also have a KDE spin for those folks.  (Again: 256MB)


With at least 128MB:

Mint also has a spin that uses the Xfce desktop.

Mint also has a more sparce, less graphical spin using the Fluxbox desktop.

I want the first spin of Mint using the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment
to come out NOW, but McLovin is having post-partum health problems
and there have been delays with that.
This one should fit in between the Xfce spin and the Fluxbox spin.
I fully expect the LXDE spin of Linux Mint to be the Win98 Killer.


Others:
Knoppix is legendary for its hardware support.

Puppy has a well-established rep for running on anything--even old, slow boxes.

SliTaz is an up-and-comer that's light but nice.
moonOS is another in that category.


There are a lot of ideas down a bit on this page:
http://annoyances.org/exec/forum/win98/1253042777
The DistroWatch search engine linked there is pretty great.
The individual DistroWatch page for a distro is a good place to start.
Side by side, those give a level-playing-field comparison to some extent.


NOTE:  The lighter distros sometimes don't come with what I consider basics;
several don't include a mail client, so you can't test drive that.
Some don't include an offfice suite--or ANY office software.[1]

The thinking often is that this far into the 21st Century,
everybody has a fast 'Net connection.  8-(

The "package managers" of Linux distros make it a snap to get the apps you need
--but, again, it ASSuMEs a good download capacity.


[1] ...then there's Debian Linux which comes with 3 office suites.
That one is in the Ubuntu / Mint(Gnome) class for power.




Written in response to:
re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 at 5:03 pm)

Responses to this message:
*re: An OS that doesn't require activation (was:...XP...) (Alan: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 at 7:27 pm)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 1:56 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Steve: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 2:50 pm)
*re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 3:13 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Steve: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 3:06 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 3:18 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Steve: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 3:30 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 3:41 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Steve: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 3:56 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 4:28 pm)
*re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (gewg_: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 5:16 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 5:00 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Steve: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 6:33 pm)
*re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 7:12 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (gewg_: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 5:14 pm)
*re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 5:20 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (gewg_: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 3:36 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 3:55 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Arminius: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 5:16 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Arminius: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 5:19 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (gewg_: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 5:25 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Arminius: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 6:20 pm)
*re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (gewg_: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 6:41 pm)
-Another alternative? (was:...XP...) (gewg_: Thu, Sep 17, 2009, 10:02 am)
-re: Another alternative? (was:...XP...) (Arminius: Thu, Sep 17, 2009, 9:22 pm)
*re: Another alternative? (was:...XP...) (gewg_: Thu, Sep 17, 2009, 10:40 pm)
-re: Another alternative? (was:...XP...) (Arminius: Sat, Sep 26, 2009, 8:53 pm)
-re: Another alternative? (was:...XP...) (gewg_: Sun, Sep 27, 2009, 2:05 pm)
-re: Another alternative? (was:...XP...) (Arminius: Sun, Sep 27, 2009, 5:00 pm)
*re: Another alternative? (was:...XP...) (gewg_: Sun, Sep 27, 2009, 11:38 pm)
-re: Will the end of XP support, end the code nuisance ? (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 5:03 pm)
-An OS that doesn't require activation (was:...XP...) (gewg_: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 6:46 pm)
*re: An OS that doesn't require activation (was:...XP...) (Alan: Wed, Sep 16, 2009, 7:27 pm)
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright ©1995-2012 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.