Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 98 Discussion Forum » Message 1254938715 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 at 11:05 am
Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by gewg_ (4444 messages posted)


Kiwi wrote:
|I've been using Opera for several reasons,
|the most basic simply being that it still tries to support Windows98
|
Actually, Opera does a lot more than just try.  Opera is an exceptional corporation
--this from a guy who has a low opinion of corps in general
and who simply despises many corps.

|Opera 10 runs as though in thick molasses at 200 MHz!  
|
As Arminius notes, once again, Opera has a wonderful business model
which actually demonstrates how much they treasure their patrons
(unlike you-know-who and all **their** BS).

|I would appreciate a few Opera-replacement suggestions, folks!  
|
Dillo is noted for its lightness and is used in many super-light Linux distros.
M$-oriented developers, however, haven't paid it much mind
so the Windoze port of Dillo mostly sucks.  8-(

K-Meleon started with the same codebase as Firefox and whittled away at that.
In the process, they got one of the more lightweight browsers  8-)
--but compatibility with the amazing extension/theme infrastructure was lost.  8-(
cache 
of  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-Meleon

There are also the text-based browsers:  Lynx, Links, Elinks...
They get the fastest pageloads--but forget graphics, plug-ins, extensions.
cache 
of  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Links_(web_browser)




Written in response to:
Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 at 4:10 am)

Responses to this message:
*re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 at 8:34 pm)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 4:10 am)
-re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Arminius: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 7:43 am)
*re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 8:28 pm)
-re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 11:05 am)
-re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 8:34 pm)
-re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 9:16 pm)
-re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 10:32 pm)
-re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 11:24 pm)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 10:21 am)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Arminius: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 3:41 pm)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (gewg_: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 6:13 pm)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Arminius: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 9:18 pm)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (gewg_: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 12:04 am)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Arminius: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 2:34 am)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (gewg_: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 1:47 pm)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 2:15 pm)
*re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Arminius: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 9:05 pm)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 2:07 pm)
*re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 3:24 pm)
*re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (gewg_: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 6:07 pm)
*re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 1:51 pm)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 1:25 pm)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (gewg_: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 6:14 pm)
-re: Maybe a fresh new thread, instead? (Kiwi: Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 8:33 pm)
*re: Maybe a fresh new thread, instead? (gewg_: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 11:48 am)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Arminius: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 8:49 pm)
*re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Sat, Oct 10, 2009, 7:21 am)
*re: Another "Lightweight", it's K-Meleon. (Kiwi: Sun, Oct 11, 2009, 2:50 pm)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (gewg_: Sat, Oct 10, 2009, 2:16 pm)
-re: The first Lightweight something is running now (Kiwi: Sat, Oct 10, 2009, 6:56 pm)
-re: The first Lightweight something is running now (gewg_: Sat, Oct 10, 2009, 9:25 pm)
-re: Do all of these things still require the intermediate CD construction? (Kiwi: Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 6:56 pm)
-re: Do all of these things still require the intermediate CD construction? (gewg_: Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 9:44 pm)
-re: Do all of these things still require the intermediate CD construction? (Kiwi: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 4:10 am)
-re: Do all of these things still require the intermediate CD construction? (gewg_: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 11:55 am)
-re: So far, I haven't seen the Xubuntu GUI illustrated (Kiwi: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 1:10 pm)
-re: So far, I haven't seen the Xubuntu GUI illustrated (gewg_: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 3:38 pm)
*re: The fluxbox GUI in DSL doesn't look too bad at all (Kiwi: Tue, Oct 20, 2009, 4:06 pm)
-Broadband that almost isn't (Kiwi: Wed, Oct 21, 2009, 5:35 pm)
*re: Broadband that almost isn't (gewg_: Wed, Oct 21, 2009, 7:24 pm)
-re: So far, I haven't seen the Xubuntu GUI illustrated (gewg_: Tue, Oct 20, 2009, 11:11 am)
-Bee Linux (Kiwi: Wed, Oct 21, 2009, 1:54 am)
*re: Bee Linux (gewg_: Wed, Oct 21, 2009, 8:03 am)
-re: Do all of these things still require the intermediate CD construction? (gewg_: Tue, Nov 10, 2009, 11:25 pm)
*Boot your OS (ISO) without even burning to optical media (gewg_: Sun, Sep 18, 2011, 6:35 pm)
*re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (gewg_: Mon, Feb 7, 2011, 12:37 pm)
-re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (J.R.: Mon, Nov 2, 2009, 8:16 pm)
*re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (gewg_: Mon, Nov 2, 2009, 8:52 pm)
-Found: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Tue, Nov 3, 2009, 12:59 am)
-re: Found: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (gewg_: Tue, Nov 3, 2009, 12:34 pm)
*re: Found: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Tue, Nov 3, 2009, 12:58 pm)
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright ©1995-2012 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.