re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 at 11:05 am Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by gewg_
(4444 messages posted)
Kiwi wrote:
|I've been using Opera for several reasons,
|the most basic simply being that it still tries to support Windows98
|
Actually, Opera does a lot more than just try. Opera is an exceptional corporation
--this from a guy who has a low opinion of corps in general
and who simply despises many corps.
|Opera 10 runs as though in thick molasses at 200 MHz!
|
As Arminius notes, once again, Opera has a wonderful business model
which actually demonstrates how much they treasure their patrons
(unlike you-know-who and all **their** BS).
|I would appreciate a few Opera-replacement suggestions, folks!
|
Dillo is noted for its lightness and is used in many super-light Linux distros.
M$-oriented developers, however, haven't paid it much mind
so the Windoze port of Dillo mostly sucks. 8-(
K-Meleon started with the same codebase as Firefox and whittled away at that.
In the process, they got one of the more lightweight browsers 8-)
--but compatibility with the amazing extension/theme infrastructure was lost. 8-(
cache
of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-Meleon
There are also the text-based browsers: Lynx, Links, Elinks...
They get the fastest pageloads--but forget graphics, plug-ins, extensions.
cache
of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Links_(web_browser)
|
All messages in this thread [show all]
 |  | re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 11:05 am) |
| |
| |
| |
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum
|
|