Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 98 Discussion Forum » Message 1254975407 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 at 9:16 pm
Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by gewg_ (4444 messages posted)


Kiwi wrote:
|One or the other of the Wiki links eventually led me to an article I could use.
|
Sometimes the back door is as good as the front.  8-)

|[...]Several years ago, I had tested a version of K-Meleon some,
|ended up not needing it after all, and then forgot its name.  
|
Wikipedia articles with "Comparison of" or "List of" in their names are useful.
I know the feeling of trying to break the rust free from the old thinker sometimes.

|Midori looks as if if will be interesting, but not while still in a very raw stage.
|
I don't think that is an option anyway.  Midori is based on the WebKit engine
and I haven't seen anything that would lead me to believe it works under Win9x.
I do know that Google Chrome (also WebKit-based) doesn't support Win9x.
I haven't tried Midori (WebKit browsers don't have extensive extension sets);
the extensions for SeaMonkey(/Firefox) are addictive--even under Windoze.

|There's another one named Ultrabrowser I'll be looking at.
|
That uses the Trident engine, so you'd be getting the same old vulnerabilities
--basically a re-skinned Internet Exploder.

OTOH, the other week I mentioned a twist on both of these
where you keep IE's user interface but add a Google-provided plug-in
that substitutes the WebKit engine under the old skin:
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/forum/win98/1253992383

Sites have to be tweaked to get IE to switch over
--or, via the Address Bar you can manually tell it to swap rendering engines:
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1382925&cid=29547985#29548721
(CF==Chrome Frame)

Google developed that to get HTML5 compliance out of M$'s junk--even IE6--
so that their cutting-edge stuff will run under Windoze.
MS's junk is just so sad--even their latest stuff is just pitiful:
cache 
of  http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Acid3

What's dishearting is how other countries are zooming by us getting their freedom
while so many of us (especially the policy makers) are mired in the last century:
from the Usenet Archive:
Another South American county finds that freedom is also cheaper.




Written in response to:
re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 at 8:34 pm)

Responses to this message:
*re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 at 10:32 pm)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 4:10 am)
-re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Arminius: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 7:43 am)
*re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 8:28 pm)
-re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 11:05 am)
-re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 8:34 pm)
-re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 9:16 pm)
-re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 10:32 pm)
-re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 11:24 pm)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 10:21 am)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Arminius: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 3:41 pm)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (gewg_: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 6:13 pm)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Arminius: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 9:18 pm)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (gewg_: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 12:04 am)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Arminius: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 2:34 am)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (gewg_: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 1:47 pm)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 2:15 pm)
*re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Arminius: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 9:05 pm)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 2:07 pm)
*re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 3:24 pm)
*re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (gewg_: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 6:07 pm)
*re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 1:51 pm)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 1:25 pm)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (gewg_: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 6:14 pm)
-re: Maybe a fresh new thread, instead? (Kiwi: Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 8:33 pm)
*re: Maybe a fresh new thread, instead? (gewg_: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 11:48 am)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Arminius: Fri, Oct 9, 2009, 8:49 pm)
*re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (Kiwi: Sat, Oct 10, 2009, 7:21 am)
*re: Another "Lightweight", it's K-Meleon. (Kiwi: Sun, Oct 11, 2009, 2:50 pm)
-re: As long as it's "Lightweight", there is this as well . . (gewg_: Sat, Oct 10, 2009, 2:16 pm)
-re: The first Lightweight something is running now (Kiwi: Sat, Oct 10, 2009, 6:56 pm)
-re: The first Lightweight something is running now (gewg_: Sat, Oct 10, 2009, 9:25 pm)
-re: Do all of these things still require the intermediate CD construction? (Kiwi: Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 6:56 pm)
-re: Do all of these things still require the intermediate CD construction? (gewg_: Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 9:44 pm)
-re: Do all of these things still require the intermediate CD construction? (Kiwi: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 4:10 am)
-re: Do all of these things still require the intermediate CD construction? (gewg_: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 11:55 am)
-re: So far, I haven't seen the Xubuntu GUI illustrated (Kiwi: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 1:10 pm)
-re: So far, I haven't seen the Xubuntu GUI illustrated (gewg_: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 3:38 pm)
*re: The fluxbox GUI in DSL doesn't look too bad at all (Kiwi: Tue, Oct 20, 2009, 4:06 pm)
-Broadband that almost isn't (Kiwi: Wed, Oct 21, 2009, 5:35 pm)
*re: Broadband that almost isn't (gewg_: Wed, Oct 21, 2009, 7:24 pm)
-re: So far, I haven't seen the Xubuntu GUI illustrated (gewg_: Tue, Oct 20, 2009, 11:11 am)
-Bee Linux (Kiwi: Wed, Oct 21, 2009, 1:54 am)
*re: Bee Linux (gewg_: Wed, Oct 21, 2009, 8:03 am)
-re: Do all of these things still require the intermediate CD construction? (gewg_: Tue, Nov 10, 2009, 11:25 pm)
*Boot your OS (ISO) without even burning to optical media (gewg_: Sun, Sep 18, 2011, 6:35 pm)
*re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (gewg_: Mon, Feb 7, 2011, 12:37 pm)
-re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (J.R.: Mon, Nov 2, 2009, 8:16 pm)
*re: Wanted: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (gewg_: Mon, Nov 2, 2009, 8:52 pm)
-Found: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Tue, Nov 3, 2009, 12:59 am)
-re: Found: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (gewg_: Tue, Nov 3, 2009, 12:34 pm)
*re: Found: Lightweight Browser for old, slow PC (Kiwi: Tue, Nov 3, 2009, 12:58 pm)
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright ©1995-2012 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.