Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 98 Discussion Forum » Message 1256696914 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

The single biggest problem on the 'Net (was:...EULAs)
Tuesday, October 27, 2009 at 7:28 pm
Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by gewg_ (4444 messages posted)


gewg_ wrote:
||(Linux guys DON'T have to worry about infections).
||
sekirt wrote:
|You wouldn't be able to say that if Linux had,
|say, 50% or more of the market.
|
gewg_ wrote:
:Well, now you went and poked the bear.
:
:Only fools rely on Security Through Obscurity.
:That has never been a valid security model and Unix has always known that.
:
:The markets where Open Source Software already dominates are:
:
:1) The Apache Web server
:The competition is M$'s Internet Information Server.
:Despite IIS being in the minority WRT installations,
:IIS has orders of magnitude more security breaches than Apache.

Another guy has put a fine point on this.
He lists even more M$ apps (besides IIS)
and enumerates how the vast majority of the problems on the Internet
are due to brain-dead M$ technologies at the server end: 
from the Usenet Archive: Rex Ballard -- The Big Problem is...

If all the M$ junk was scraped off all the servers,
there would be a lot fewer mechanisms for the malware to enter the stream.

Note also the title of that thread;
for being a relatively small percentage of the systems on the server end of the 'Net,
M$ junk causes a disproportionate amount of the grief.

...and, of course, if there weren't any M$ client boxes to get infected,
the infection level on the Internet would drop to within eleven 9s of zero.




Written in response to:
re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (sekirt: Sunday, October 18, 2009 at 11:20 pm)

There are presently no replies to this message.

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 2:54 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (Steve: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 6:42 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 10:20 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (Steve: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 6:58 am)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 11:15 am)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (Steve: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 11:47 am)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 1:57 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (sekirt: Sat, Oct 17, 2009, 5:37 am)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Sat, Oct 17, 2009, 2:05 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (sekirt: Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 11:20 pm)
*re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 12:02 pm)
*The single biggest problem on the 'Net (was:...EULAs) (gewg_: Tue, Oct 27, 2009, 7:28 pm)
-INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (gewg_: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 2:03 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 2:37 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (gewg_: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 6:24 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 7:46 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (gewg_: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 10:53 pm)
*re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 11:20 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (gewg_: Sun, Nov 22, 2009, 8:25 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Sun, Nov 22, 2009, 9:02 pm)
-"Ridiculous" (gewg_: Wed, Dec 9, 2009, 12:31 pm)
-re: "Ridiculous" (sekirt: Wed, Dec 9, 2009, 7:00 pm)
-re: "Ridiculous" (gewg_: Wed, Dec 9, 2009, 8:54 pm)
-re: "Ridiculous" (sekirt: Wed, Dec 9, 2009, 11:50 pm)
-The relative ease of tasks under ______ (gewg_: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 9:13 am)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (sekirt: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 9:30 am)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (gewg_: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 10:27 am)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (sekirt: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 3:38 pm)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (gewg_: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 5:31 pm)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (sekirt: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 10:04 pm)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (sekirt: Sun, Dec 13, 2009, 3:52 pm)
*Browsers (More thread drift) (gewg_: Sun, Dec 13, 2009, 7:33 pm)
-The "only has security via obscurity" thing debunked once again (gewg_: Fri, Jan 21, 2011, 3:58 pm)
*re: The "only has security via obscurity" thing debunked once again (sekirt: Fri, Jan 21, 2011, 8:06 pm)
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright ©1995-2012 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.