Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 98 Discussion Forum » Message 1257977038 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed
Wednesday, November 11, 2009 at 2:03 pm
Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by gewg_ (4444 messages posted)


gewg_ wrote:
||(Linux guys DON'T have to worry about infections).
||
sekirt wrote:
|You wouldn't be able to say that if Linux had,
|say, 50% or more of the market.

I stumbled on a page by a talented writer[1]
who did a really good job of putting together _all_ the pieces:
cache
of  http://www.downloadsquad.com/2008/02/14/flipping-the-linux-switch-the-anti-virus-question/print

NOTE:  *n?x is NOT a panacea.
It *still* can't protect you from YOUR OWN stupidity.
If you download a Linux-compatible app from a dubious source[2]
then make the effort to flip the x bit to executable then run that,
you CAN expect it to do nasty things to **YOUR** home directory.

If, however, you haven't unnecessarily monkeyed with privileges
(i.e. you've just left them in their default-install state[3]),
the OTHER users on the system won't be affected in the slightest by YOUR stupidity:
the Linux operating system won't need to be disinfected nor reinstalled
nor its security or state thought about in the slightest.

Note: The *human interaction* part
is the reason that **thoughtful** Windoze users (e.g. Steve)
can often get by without band-aids plastered all over their systems.
...and Linux's unflipped x bit on downloaded files makes the final difference.
http://google.com/search?q=r-w-x-r-w-x-r-w-x+permissions+owner+group+other
Again, it's about an OS that's NOT Defective By Design.


[1] More of Kristin's excellent work:
google.com/search?q=site:downloadsquad.com+intitle:"Flipping.the.Linux.switch"

[2] Vetted repositories of Linux-compatible software are SIMPLE to find;
crap sources are easily spotted.

[3] ...and use su and/or sudo to do things that require elevated privileges.
This is why I say that Puppy is NOT real Linux and should be avoided.
Others that suck for the same reason:  dyna:bolic; XandrOS; Linspire/Freespire.




Written in response to:
re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (sekirt: Sunday, October 18, 2009 at 11:20 pm)

Responses to this message:
*re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 at 2:37 pm)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 2:54 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (Steve: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 6:42 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 10:20 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (Steve: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 6:58 am)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 11:15 am)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (Steve: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 11:47 am)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 1:57 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (sekirt: Sat, Oct 17, 2009, 5:37 am)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Sat, Oct 17, 2009, 2:05 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (sekirt: Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 11:20 pm)
*re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 12:02 pm)
*The single biggest problem on the 'Net (was:...EULAs) (gewg_: Tue, Oct 27, 2009, 7:28 pm)
-INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (gewg_: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 2:03 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 2:37 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (gewg_: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 6:24 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 7:46 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (gewg_: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 10:53 pm)
*re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 11:20 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (gewg_: Sun, Nov 22, 2009, 8:25 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Sun, Nov 22, 2009, 9:02 pm)
-"Ridiculous" (gewg_: Wed, Dec 9, 2009, 12:31 pm)
-re: "Ridiculous" (sekirt: Wed, Dec 9, 2009, 7:00 pm)
-re: "Ridiculous" (gewg_: Wed, Dec 9, 2009, 8:54 pm)
-re: "Ridiculous" (sekirt: Wed, Dec 9, 2009, 11:50 pm)
-The relative ease of tasks under ______ (gewg_: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 9:13 am)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (sekirt: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 9:30 am)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (gewg_: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 10:27 am)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (sekirt: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 3:38 pm)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (gewg_: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 5:31 pm)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (sekirt: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 10:04 pm)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (sekirt: Sun, Dec 13, 2009, 3:52 pm)
*Browsers (More thread drift) (gewg_: Sun, Dec 13, 2009, 7:33 pm)
-The "only has security via obscurity" thing debunked once again (gewg_: Fri, Jan 21, 2011, 3:58 pm)
*re: The "only has security via obscurity" thing debunked once again (sekirt: Fri, Jan 21, 2011, 8:06 pm)
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright ©1995-2012 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.