Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 98 Discussion Forum » Message 1260466208 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

re: The relative ease of tasks under ______
Thursday, December 10, 2009 at 9:30 am
Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by sekirt (297 messages posted)


Thanks.

A "NoScript extension" would be against my very nature
though.  That is one thing I want my browser to do,
handle scripts.



sekirt



On Thursday, December 10, 2009 at 9:13 am, gewg_ wrote:
>sekirt wrote:
>|I got the lyrics though! Yay!
>|
>Here's how I get lyrics:
>http://google.com/search?q=Lyrics+"Walk.Of.Life"&num=100
>Middle-click[1] on the Cached link to get the results in a new tab.
>If your connection is slow and/or your reaction time is fast,
>you can use the Stop button or Esc key to interrupt the retrieval;
>append &strip=1 to the URL and hit Enter.
>(If you didn't interupt before the page started displaying,
>hit Ctrl+Enter and that will give you a fresh tab (again: [1]).)
>Now you get the page without graphics[2] and WITHOUT SCRIPTS.
>
>I note that Google _used_ to also include page sizes in their listings
>(which were a lot more useful than those stupid Similar links that they kept).
>
>In addition, routinely using a NoScript extension would avoid a lot of nasties.
>The one for Mozilla/Gecko browsers is exceptionally useful as it can whitelist;
>there are several (lesser efforts) floating around for Internet Exploder as well.
>...and pages that won't do squat without scripts running, I can do without.
>
>gewg_ wrote:
>||http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/10things/?p=1196
>
>|"10 Windows features I would like to see in Linux"
>|
>|At least the guy is fair.
>|
>Well, on Item 10 he missed mentioning the 3rd-party SysInfo utilities for Windoze
>--but, yeah--he did back up his opinions with hard facts at every turn.
>
>It's difficult to find a point at which Linux isn't superior in the way it does things.
>"Windoze does things the way I'm used to"
>is NOT the same as "Windoze is easier".
>Old addage: "The only intuitive interface is the nipple; everything else is learned."
>...and with Linux, learning new tricks not only makes things easier,
>you can often do things that aren't even possible
>with systems running M$'s junk (with the GUI-centric ecosystem).
>
>Where Linux REALLY shines relative to M$'s skimpy offerings
>is getting it to do stuff that doesn't come with the base install.
>Vetted repositories of software are SO cool
>and Linux package managers just leave Windoze users with their jaws agape.[3]
>
>OTOH, with Windoze, you do A LOT of searching for 3rd-party stuff
>and have to go to a lot of potentially dodgy sites to get those.
>Add in a browser that is infection-friendly and a naive user
>--or just an unlucky user--and you have a recipe for disaster.
>In short: The antithesis of Linux.
>
>
>[1] I'm ASSuMEing a Mozilla/Gecko browser. YMMV.
>
>[2] Background images excepted--unless you have an extension to handle those.
>
>[3] Being able to actually USE the computer during an update/install process
>just blows the minds of Windoze users. No reboots is very cool as well.




Written in response to:
The relative ease of tasks under ______ (gewg_: Thursday, December 10, 2009 at 9:13 am)

Responses to this message:
*re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (gewg_: Thursday, December 10, 2009 at 10:27 am)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 2:54 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (Steve: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 6:42 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 10:20 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (Steve: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 6:58 am)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 11:15 am)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (Steve: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 11:47 am)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 1:57 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (sekirt: Sat, Oct 17, 2009, 5:37 am)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Sat, Oct 17, 2009, 2:05 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (sekirt: Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 11:20 pm)
*re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 12:02 pm)
*The single biggest problem on the 'Net (was:...EULAs) (gewg_: Tue, Oct 27, 2009, 7:28 pm)
-INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (gewg_: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 2:03 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 2:37 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (gewg_: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 6:24 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 7:46 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (gewg_: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 10:53 pm)
*re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 11:20 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (gewg_: Sun, Nov 22, 2009, 8:25 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Sun, Nov 22, 2009, 9:02 pm)
-"Ridiculous" (gewg_: Wed, Dec 9, 2009, 12:31 pm)
-re: "Ridiculous" (sekirt: Wed, Dec 9, 2009, 7:00 pm)
-re: "Ridiculous" (gewg_: Wed, Dec 9, 2009, 8:54 pm)
-re: "Ridiculous" (sekirt: Wed, Dec 9, 2009, 11:50 pm)
-The relative ease of tasks under ______ (gewg_: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 9:13 am)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (sekirt: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 9:30 am)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (gewg_: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 10:27 am)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (sekirt: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 3:38 pm)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (gewg_: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 5:31 pm)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (sekirt: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 10:04 pm)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (sekirt: Sun, Dec 13, 2009, 3:52 pm)
*Browsers (More thread drift) (gewg_: Sun, Dec 13, 2009, 7:33 pm)
-The "only has security via obscurity" thing debunked once again (gewg_: Fri, Jan 21, 2011, 3:58 pm)
*re: The "only has security via obscurity" thing debunked once again (sekirt: Fri, Jan 21, 2011, 8:06 pm)
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright ©1995-2012 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.