re: IE6 being phased out at Google Thursday, February 4, 2010 at 6:28 pm Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum Posted by jack hall (308 messages posted) Yes and no. I understand the issues, but I've had it for 7 years, and it's been good to me and for me, as well as being able to service. There was (hell is, I have XP Pro but I'm talking to you on the 98SE machine now. We had scanreg/restore, SFC, both great tools, and with a burner, later, flash USB drives, and broadband capable. Should disaster strike, with a floppy boot disk, drivers, everything backed up, and the install disk, you were up and running in about 2.5 hours. Good as new. Cost $0.00. What's to complain about. On Thursday, February 4, 2010 at 5:25 pm, sekirt wrote: >I hope you are being facetious! > > > > >color=#6a5acd size=3>sekirt Written in response to: re: IE6 being phased out at Google (sekirt: Thursday, February 4, 2010 at 5:25 pm) Responses to this message: re: IE6 being phased out at Google (gewg_: Friday, February 5, 2010 at 10:43 am) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (sekirt: Saturday, February 6, 2010 at 6:51 am) All messages in this thread [show all] IE6 being phased out at Google (sekirt: Mon, Feb 1, 2010, 4:35 am) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (gewg_: Mon, Feb 1, 2010, 11:14 am) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (jack hall: Thu, Feb 4, 2010, 8:39 am) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (gewg_: Thu, Feb 4, 2010, 12:26 pm) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (sekirt: Thu, Feb 4, 2010, 5:25 pm) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (jack hall: Thu, Feb 4, 2010, 6:28 pm) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (gewg_: Fri, Feb 5, 2010, 10:43 am) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (Arminius: Sun, Feb 7, 2010, 6:31 am) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (gewg_: Sun, Feb 7, 2010, 12:09 pm) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (sekirt: Sat, Feb 6, 2010, 6:51 am) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (Arminius: Mon, Feb 8, 2010, 7:45 am) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (gewg_: Mon, Feb 8, 2010, 1:32 pm) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (Arminius: Tue, Feb 9, 2010, 4:40 am) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (gewg_: Tue, Feb 9, 2010, 9:29 pm) Spoofing the User Agent in IE6, in Firefox, and in Opera (Ed: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 4:10 am) re: Spoofing the User Agent [won't solve the problem] (gewg_: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 10:04 am) re: Spoofing the User Agent [won't solve the problem] (douglas: Sun, Feb 21, 2010, 1:38 am) re: Spoofing the User Agent [won't solve the problem] (gewg_: Sun, Feb 21, 2010, 11:32 am) re: Spoofing the User Agent [won't solve the problem] MORE DETAILS (gewg_: Tue, Jul 5, 2011, 7:31 pm) Requirements for using HTML5 websites (gewg_: Thu, Aug 11, 2011, 12:05 pm) re: Requirements for using HTML5 websites (Arminius: Thu, Aug 11, 2011, 4:17 pm) re: Requirements for using HTML5 websites (gewg_: Thu, Aug 11, 2011, 5:26 pm) re: Requirements for using HTML5 websites (Arminius: Thu, Aug 11, 2011, 6:15 pm) re: Requirements for using HTML5 websites (gewg_: Thu, Aug 11, 2011, 11:21 pm) re: Requirements for using HTML5 websites (Arminius: Fri, Aug 12, 2011, 6:13 am) re: Requirements for using HTML5 websites (gewg_: Fri, Aug 12, 2011, 2:37 pm) re: Spoofing the User Agent in IE6, in Firefox, and in Opera (gerald Keene: Thu, May 5, 2011, 12:09 pm) re: Spoofing the User Agent in IE6, in Firefox, and in Opera (Ed: Mon, Jul 18, 2011, 6:06 am) re: Spoofing the User Agent [is a waste of time for this] (gewg_: Mon, Jul 18, 2011, 1:46 pm) Reply or follow-up to this message Search this forum Start a new thread on a different subject Report abuse of the forum Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum