re: IE6 being phased out at Google Saturday, February 6, 2010 at 6:51 am Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum Posted by sekirt (297 messages posted) I can partially agree with you, I liked Win98 - but it is certainly time to move on. In any case, you'll still be able to use IE6 for months, maybe years. Not all websites will stop you. sekirt On Thursday, February 4, 2010 at 6:28 pm, jack hall wrote: >Yes and no. I understand the issues, but I've had it for 7 years, and it's been good to me and for me, as well as being able to service. There was (hell is, I have XP Pro but I'm talking to you on the 98SE machine now. We had scanreg/restore, SFC, both great tools, and with a burner, later, flash USB drives, and broadband capable. Should disaster strike, with a floppy boot disk, drivers, everything backed up, and the install disk, you were up and running in about 2.5 hours. Good as new. Cost $0.00. What's to complain about. Written in response to: re: IE6 being phased out at Google (jack hall: Thursday, February 4, 2010 at 6:28 pm) There are presently no replies to this message. All messages in this thread [show all] IE6 being phased out at Google (sekirt: Mon, Feb 1, 2010, 4:35 am) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (gewg_: Mon, Feb 1, 2010, 11:14 am) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (jack hall: Thu, Feb 4, 2010, 8:39 am) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (gewg_: Thu, Feb 4, 2010, 12:26 pm) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (sekirt: Thu, Feb 4, 2010, 5:25 pm) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (jack hall: Thu, Feb 4, 2010, 6:28 pm) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (gewg_: Fri, Feb 5, 2010, 10:43 am) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (Arminius: Sun, Feb 7, 2010, 6:31 am) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (gewg_: Sun, Feb 7, 2010, 12:09 pm) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (sekirt: Sat, Feb 6, 2010, 6:51 am) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (Arminius: Mon, Feb 8, 2010, 7:45 am) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (gewg_: Mon, Feb 8, 2010, 1:32 pm) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (Arminius: Tue, Feb 9, 2010, 4:40 am) re: IE6 being phased out at Google (gewg_: Tue, Feb 9, 2010, 9:29 pm) Spoofing the User Agent in IE6, in Firefox, and in Opera (Ed: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 4:10 am) re: Spoofing the User Agent [won't solve the problem] (gewg_: Thu, Feb 11, 2010, 10:04 am) re: Spoofing the User Agent [won't solve the problem] (douglas: Sun, Feb 21, 2010, 1:38 am) re: Spoofing the User Agent [won't solve the problem] (gewg_: Sun, Feb 21, 2010, 11:32 am) re: Spoofing the User Agent [won't solve the problem] MORE DETAILS (gewg_: Tue, Jul 5, 2011, 7:31 pm) Requirements for using HTML5 websites (gewg_: Thu, Aug 11, 2011, 12:05 pm) re: Requirements for using HTML5 websites (Arminius: Thu, Aug 11, 2011, 4:17 pm) re: Requirements for using HTML5 websites (gewg_: Thu, Aug 11, 2011, 5:26 pm) re: Requirements for using HTML5 websites (Arminius: Thu, Aug 11, 2011, 6:15 pm) re: Requirements for using HTML5 websites (gewg_: Thu, Aug 11, 2011, 11:21 pm) re: Requirements for using HTML5 websites (Arminius: Fri, Aug 12, 2011, 6:13 am) re: Requirements for using HTML5 websites (gewg_: Fri, Aug 12, 2011, 2:37 pm) re: Spoofing the User Agent in IE6, in Firefox, and in Opera (gerald Keene: Thu, May 5, 2011, 12:09 pm) re: Spoofing the User Agent in IE6, in Firefox, and in Opera (Ed: Mon, Jul 18, 2011, 6:06 am) re: Spoofing the User Agent [is a waste of time for this] (gewg_: Mon, Jul 18, 2011, 1:46 pm) Reply or follow-up to this message Search this forum Start a new thread on a different subject Report abuse of the forum Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum