Annoyances.org
Home » Windows 98 Discussion Forum » Message 1295654291 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

The "only has security via obscurity" thing debunked once again
Friday, January 21, 2011 at 3:58 pm
Windows 98 Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by gewg_ (4444 messages posted)


gewg_ wrote:
||(Linux guys DON'T have to worry about infections).

sekirt wrote:
|You wouldn't be able to say that if Linux had,
|say, 50% or more of the market.

:The fans of other OS often claim
:that given a large enough share to bother malware creators[,]
:GNU/Linux will be a target[,]
:so there’s no need to migrate to GNU/Linux for security. Chuckle...
:
:Here’s an example of a "botnet"
:that does target every PC running Java, including GNU/Linux.
:They show that about 16 per cent of infections hit Macs.
:[...]
:MacOS has a much lower share than 16%.
:[...]
:They didn’t show any infections on Linux machines.
:[...]
:Jnanabot attacks on the open source platform weren’t able to survive a reboot
:
cache 
of  http://mrpogson.com/2011/01/20/an-example-of-malware-in-gnulinux/




Written in response to:
re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (sekirt: Sunday, October 18, 2009 at 11:20 pm)

Responses to this message:
*re: The "only has security via obscurity" thing debunked once again (sekirt: Friday, January 21, 2011 at 8:06 pm)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 2:54 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (Steve: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 6:42 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Wed, Oct 7, 2009, 10:20 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (Steve: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 6:58 am)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 11:15 am)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (Steve: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 11:47 am)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Thu, Oct 8, 2009, 1:57 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (sekirt: Sat, Oct 17, 2009, 5:37 am)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Sat, Oct 17, 2009, 2:05 pm)
-re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (sekirt: Sun, Oct 18, 2009, 11:20 pm)
*re: Another serious blow delivered to the validity of EULAs (gewg_: Mon, Oct 19, 2009, 12:02 pm)
*The single biggest problem on the 'Net (was:...EULAs) (gewg_: Tue, Oct 27, 2009, 7:28 pm)
-INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (gewg_: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 2:03 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 2:37 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (gewg_: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 6:24 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 7:46 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (gewg_: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 10:53 pm)
*re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Wed, Nov 11, 2009, 11:20 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (gewg_: Sun, Nov 22, 2009, 8:25 pm)
-re: INFECTIONS: The old wives' tale put to bed (sekirt: Sun, Nov 22, 2009, 9:02 pm)
-"Ridiculous" (gewg_: Wed, Dec 9, 2009, 12:31 pm)
-re: "Ridiculous" (sekirt: Wed, Dec 9, 2009, 7:00 pm)
-re: "Ridiculous" (gewg_: Wed, Dec 9, 2009, 8:54 pm)
-re: "Ridiculous" (sekirt: Wed, Dec 9, 2009, 11:50 pm)
-The relative ease of tasks under ______ (gewg_: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 9:13 am)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (sekirt: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 9:30 am)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (gewg_: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 10:27 am)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (sekirt: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 3:38 pm)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (gewg_: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 5:31 pm)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (sekirt: Thu, Dec 10, 2009, 10:04 pm)
-re: The relative ease of tasks under ______ (sekirt: Sun, Dec 13, 2009, 3:52 pm)
*Browsers (More thread drift) (gewg_: Sun, Dec 13, 2009, 7:33 pm)
-The "only has security via obscurity" thing debunked once again (gewg_: Fri, Jan 21, 2011, 3:58 pm)
*re: The "only has security via obscurity" thing debunked once again (sekirt: Fri, Jan 21, 2011, 8:06 pm)
Return to the Windows 98 Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright ©1995-2012 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.