Annoyances.org
Home » Windows Me Discussion Forum » Message 1008952276 Search | Help | Home
  
re: Why are cracks illegal?
Friday, December 21, 2001 at 8:31 am
Windows Me Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by khawk (12 messages posted)





On Sunday, November 25, 2001 at 11:06 am, UnDEAD wrote:
>I think they are illegal because they're made by reverse engineering the product
>(... but how do they prove this?), and because you're not allowed to modify the program
>in it's binary form...
>
>*what the hell... you can't even debug an operating system you bought?* Well, you
>can... But you're not allowed to spread information, tools, utilities, papers on
>what you've learned...
>
>
>


>On Monday, November 12, 2001 at 12:00 pm, mmp wrote:
>You mention that cracks are unethical and illegal. Why exactly? Unethical - i
>guess
>that is up to individuals to decide. I don't agree that it is illegal. The DMCA
>
>protects circumvension of encryption techniques to gain access to copyright materials.
>
> Is WPA really an encryption technique? I don't think so. What other laws could
>
>be used to consider WPA cracks illegal?
> Reverse Engineering and Cracks weren't illegal for the longest time. Especially reverse engineering for the purpose of Compatibility. (Now don't get too fancy and think that this ment making an unactivated WinXP compatible with your new computer, not the same thing.) The intent was for making technologies such as DVD movies play in foriegn and unsupported enviroments like Linux. However, a few years ago, Congress passed the DMCA Act which made it illegal to reverse engineer technologies that were intended to protect copywritten material. This definition is extremely vague, but does indeed cover cracks that disable the product activation. Many of the things you may have done in the past are now illegal today such as copying your Favorite VHS tape to Beta. (remember those?) Or copying your game CD's to keep in the event that you lost the original. Bottom line, you no longer own what you buy, you merely rent the right to use it in their terms.


Written in response to:
re: Why are cracks illegal? (UnDEAD: Sunday, November 25, 2001 at 11:06 am)

Responses to this message:
*re: Why are cracks illegal? (Sam Katz: Thursday, December 27, 2001 at 7:46 pm)
*Illegal only in the USA, (John Clark MsTCS: Monday, April 17, 2006 at 7:16 pm)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Why are cracks illegal? (mmp: Mon, Nov 12, 2001, 12:00 pm)
-re: Why are cracks illegal? (UnDEAD: Sun, Nov 25, 2001, 11:06 am)
-re: Why are cracks illegal? (khawk: Fri, Dec 21, 2001, 8:31 am)
-re: Why are cracks illegal? (Sam Katz: Thu, Dec 27, 2001, 7:46 pm)
*re: Why are cracks illegal? (Animus Morgan: Thu, Jun 20, 2002, 12:20 pm)
*re: Why are cracks illegal? (R N: Thu, Jan 29, 2004, 6:14 am)
*Illegal only in the USA, (John Clark MsTCS: Mon, Apr 17, 2006, 7:16 pm)
-re: Why are cracks illegal? (Rob: Wed, Aug 7, 2002, 8:41 am)
*re: Why are cracks illegal? (George Bush: Fri, Jun 24, 2005, 7:59 am)
*re: Why are cracks illegal? (z: Sat, Nov 6, 2004, 2:22 am)
*re: Why are cracks illegal? (Alex: Tue, Jan 14, 2003, 5:56 am)
-re: Why are cracks illegal? (Marko B.: Sat, Aug 2, 2003, 5:24 pm)
-re: Why are cracks illegal? (Guy: Tue, Oct 21, 2003, 8:19 am)
*re: Why are cracks illegal? (JM: Sun, Dec 21, 2003, 3:16 pm)
-re: Why are cracks illegal? (Shane: Sun, Feb 15, 2004, 1:08 am)
*re: Why are cracks illegal? (Kyle: Thu, Apr 22, 2004, 12:44 am)
Return to the Windows Me Discussion Forum

All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2008 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.