|
|
|
re: Question about 'What's the difference between Windows 2000 and Windows Me?'
Tuesday, September 16, 2003 at 1:00 am
Windows Me Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by Anonymouse
(405 messages posted)
In terms of how they're put together, ME and 2000 are very different. ME is
a sort of upgraded version of 98, with a 2000-style interface but 98-compatible features
- and therefore still DOS-dependent to an extent - whereas 2000 is based on Windows
NT (actually it's NT5, but Microsoft doesn't want to admit that!). The two are entirely
incompatible.
2000 is indeed far more stable and smoother-running than 98 or ME could ever be;
installation is a lot easier. 2000's native NTFS format offers file security, including
encryption, and it's a more efficient storage system than FAT32, which means programs
generally run faster.
2000 is aimed mainly at 'serious', i.e. business and/or network users, whereas 98/ME
is for everybody.
A crucial difference is that Microsoft will be supporting 2000 for quite some time
yet, but shortly they will not be supporting 98 or ME - 98 is deemed to be
obsolete, and ME is, quite simply, the biggest mistake Microsoft ever made.
There's
no contest - go for 2000.
HTH
On Sunday, September 14, 2003 at 11:11 pm, Dinesh wrote:
>I have a question about What's
>the difference between Windows 2000 and Windows Me?:
>
>
|
All messages in this thread [show all]
 |  | re: Question about 'What's the difference between Windows 2000 and Windows Me?' (Anonymouse: Tue, Sep 16, 2003, 1:00 am) |
| |
| |
Return to the Windows Me Discussion Forum
|
|
|
|
