re: Windows ME Fixes Saturday, November 8, 2003 at 6:46 am Windows Me Annoyances Discussion Forum Posted by Ian O'Neill (4 messages posted) I am trying to find out why 70-80% of my 1.8 ghz processor is constantly in use. With 8 processes running, all essential to windows, just sitting there idling, my processor use as reported by a diagnostic is 65-85% and I would like to know why. Pc pitstop alerted me to the problem and I have spent the last week trying to find out where the resource hog is without results other than having the leanest machine in town. Amdxp 2200' 512 mb of memory kt400 chipset. I can free 430 mb of memory, so that isnt the problem nor is the swap file (500 mb) full. On Wednesday, October 1, 2003 at 8:15 pm, Jack Gulley wrote: > Repeat the step suggested about running DELINDEX.BAT from a boot diskette. It >should clear all of the System Restore files. Then if you have all of the Windows >Updates installed (including the one to fix problems with System Restore), it should >solve the problem of these files taking up space and the ability to enable and disable >System Restore. Written in response to: re: Windows ME Fixes (Jack Gulley: Wednesday, October 1, 2003 at 8:15 pm) Responses to this message: re: Windows ME Fixes (WhitPhil: Saturday, November 8, 2003 at 7:30 am) All messages in this thread [show all] seemingly random high processor activity (Sheldon Lee: Thu, Jan 30, 2003, 6:05 pm) re: seemingly random high processor activity (Jack Gulley: Thu, Jan 30, 2003, 6:59 pm) re: seemingly random high processor activity (Steve: Thu, Jan 30, 2003, 8:26 pm) I agree...excellent! (Ms. Eagle: Thu, Jan 30, 2003, 8:40 pm) re: seemingly random high processor activity (Sheldon Lee: Thu, Jan 30, 2003, 8:48 pm) re: seemingly random high processor activity (jabuck: Thu, Jan 30, 2003, 9:48 pm) Windows ME Fixes (Jack Gulley: Thu, Jan 30, 2003, 10:19 pm) re: Windows ME Fixes (Ms. Eagle: Thu, Jan 30, 2003, 10:52 pm) re: Windows ME Fixes (Steve: Fri, Jan 31, 2003, 9:21 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (Geraldine Robredo: Wed, Mar 26, 2003, 5:33 pm) re: Windows ME Fixes (Robert: Fri, May 30, 2003, 12:42 pm) re: Windows ME Fixes (Malcolm: Wed, Jul 16, 2003, 5:59 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (Jack Gulley: Wed, Oct 1, 2003, 8:15 pm) re: Windows ME Fixes (Ian O'Neill: Sat, Nov 8, 2003, 6:46 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (WhitPhil: Sat, Nov 8, 2003, 7:30 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (Ian O'Neill: Sat, Nov 8, 2003, 4:35 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (WhitPhil: Sat, Nov 8, 2003, 6:27 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (Jack Gulley: Sat, Nov 8, 2003, 6:47 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (John Doty: Sun, Feb 15, 2004, 10:48 pm) re: Windows ME Fixes (Ian O'Neill: Sat, Nov 8, 2003, 7:42 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (WhitPhil: Sat, Nov 8, 2003, 8:19 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (Marleece: Wed, Dec 31, 2003, 6:41 pm) re: Windows ME Fixes (Mike Allan: Mon, Mar 29, 2004, 9:59 pm) re: Windows ME Fixes (Jack Gulley: Tue, Mar 30, 2004, 3:26 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (somebody: Sat, Apr 24, 2004, 9:29 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (John Harbin: Sat, Jun 19, 2004, 9:47 am) re: seemingly random high processor activity (Carl D: Thu, Jan 30, 2003, 10:12 pm) re: seemingly random high processor activity (Patrick Thompson: Fri, Jan 31, 2003, 3:43 pm) Reply or follow-up to this message Search this forum Start a new thread on a different subject Report abuse of the forum Return to the Windows Me Discussion Forum