re: Windows ME Fixes Saturday, November 8, 2003 at 7:42 am Windows Me Annoyances Discussion Forum Posted by Ian O'Neill (4 messages posted) I have used system mechanic 4 and ams fast defrag. Also I went to pcpitstop who indicated my resources were low. Even after taking everything out, I never had more than 65% available resources. (Windows ->settings->system information.) On Saturday, November 8, 2003 at 4:35 am, Ian O'Neill wrote: > Perhaps you can keep me from going crazy. I have done everything you say, tried >reducing load to 8 processes, and still show cpu usage of 60 to 70 percent. When >I used wintop, "Idle" used 99 percent of usage. The system has been de-virused, >de-trojaned, dewormed and all known spyware has been removed. The disk is not fragmented >or damaged. I cannot understand this. I also did every hardware check I know of. > No matter what I do or remove, it stays the same. The only processes running are >those vital to windows. If anyone can help, I sure would appreciate it. > > Written in response to: re: Windows ME Fixes (Ian O'Neill: Saturday, November 8, 2003 at 4:35 am) Responses to this message: re: Windows ME Fixes (WhitPhil: Saturday, November 8, 2003 at 8:19 am) All messages in this thread [show all] seemingly random high processor activity (Sheldon Lee: Thu, Jan 30, 2003, 6:05 pm) re: seemingly random high processor activity (Jack Gulley: Thu, Jan 30, 2003, 6:59 pm) re: seemingly random high processor activity (Steve: Thu, Jan 30, 2003, 8:26 pm) I agree...excellent! (Ms. Eagle: Thu, Jan 30, 2003, 8:40 pm) re: seemingly random high processor activity (Sheldon Lee: Thu, Jan 30, 2003, 8:48 pm) re: seemingly random high processor activity (jabuck: Thu, Jan 30, 2003, 9:48 pm) Windows ME Fixes (Jack Gulley: Thu, Jan 30, 2003, 10:19 pm) re: Windows ME Fixes (Ms. Eagle: Thu, Jan 30, 2003, 10:52 pm) re: Windows ME Fixes (Steve: Fri, Jan 31, 2003, 9:21 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (Geraldine Robredo: Wed, Mar 26, 2003, 5:33 pm) re: Windows ME Fixes (Robert: Fri, May 30, 2003, 12:42 pm) re: Windows ME Fixes (Malcolm: Wed, Jul 16, 2003, 5:59 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (Jack Gulley: Wed, Oct 1, 2003, 8:15 pm) re: Windows ME Fixes (Ian O'Neill: Sat, Nov 8, 2003, 6:46 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (WhitPhil: Sat, Nov 8, 2003, 7:30 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (Ian O'Neill: Sat, Nov 8, 2003, 4:35 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (WhitPhil: Sat, Nov 8, 2003, 6:27 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (Jack Gulley: Sat, Nov 8, 2003, 6:47 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (John Doty: Sun, Feb 15, 2004, 10:48 pm) re: Windows ME Fixes (Ian O'Neill: Sat, Nov 8, 2003, 7:42 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (WhitPhil: Sat, Nov 8, 2003, 8:19 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (Marleece: Wed, Dec 31, 2003, 6:41 pm) re: Windows ME Fixes (Mike Allan: Mon, Mar 29, 2004, 9:59 pm) re: Windows ME Fixes (Jack Gulley: Tue, Mar 30, 2004, 3:26 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (somebody: Sat, Apr 24, 2004, 9:29 am) re: Windows ME Fixes (John Harbin: Sat, Jun 19, 2004, 9:47 am) re: seemingly random high processor activity (Carl D: Thu, Jan 30, 2003, 10:12 pm) re: seemingly random high processor activity (Patrick Thompson: Fri, Jan 31, 2003, 3:43 pm) Reply or follow-up to this message Search this forum Start a new thread on a different subject Report abuse of the forum Return to the Windows Me Discussion Forum