Annoyances.org
Home » Windows Me Discussion Forum » Message 1097942923 Search | Help | Home
  
re: NAV vs AVG
Saturday, October 16, 2004 at 9:08 am
Windows Me Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by joe (7016 messages posted)


ive had basic NAV2004 before, it is a resource hog, not to mention the support is bull....thier answer to everything is uninstall and reinstall, it has alot of crap on it and when something goes wrong, its hard as hell to detect, i have never had this problem with AVG. im not saying that NAV is a bad product, but IMO not worth the money.....Symantec should go the way of AVG and offer its basic AV for free, not a trial, but a full version and maybe i might switch back, never again will i pay for symantec!!!!!!! its a waste! again, IMO.








Written in response to:
re: NAV vs AVG (WhitPhil: Saturday, October 16, 2004 at 9:05 am)

There are presently no replies to this message.

All messages in this thread [show all]
-norton av (glen: Sat, Oct 16, 2004, 2:25 am)
*re: norton av (joe: Sat, Oct 16, 2004, 7:24 am)
-re: NAV vs AVG (Cam: Sat, Oct 16, 2004, 7:56 am)
-re: NAV vs AVG (joe: Sat, Oct 16, 2004, 8:02 am)
-re: AVG vs AVAST! (Cam: Sat, Oct 16, 2004, 8:34 am)
*re: AVG vs AVAST! (joe: Sat, Oct 16, 2004, 9:04 am)
-re: NAV vs AVG (WhitPhil: Sat, Oct 16, 2004, 9:05 am)
*re: NAV vs AVG (joe: Sat, Oct 16, 2004, 9:08 am)
*re: NAV vs AVG (Jack Gulley: Sat, Oct 16, 2004, 11:10 am)
-re: NAV vs AVG (Cam: Sat, Oct 16, 2004, 12:19 pm)
-re: NAV vs AVG (WhitPhil: Sat, Oct 16, 2004, 1:55 pm)
*re: Reply (Cam: Sat, Oct 16, 2004, 11:21 pm)
*re: NAV vs AVG (werner: Sat, Oct 16, 2004, 6:58 pm)
Return to the Windows Me Discussion Forum

All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright © 1995-2008 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.