|
|
|
cant find a disc compression utility
Showing all messages in thread #1203742952 Windows Me Annoyances Discussion Forum
The following are all of the messages in this thread (4 in all), shown in chronological order. Click any message subject to view that message by itself or to view the thread hierarchy.
|
cant find a disc compression utility
Friday, February 22, 2008 at 9:02 pm Posted by mntmanmaps
(1 messages posted)
Havent used ME in a few years forgot it doesnt have disc compression with it. Tried
to find some of the old compression utilities and cant find anything, anyone know
of any disc compression utility downloads?
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: cant find a disc compression utility
Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 6:20 am Posted by Keith Stanier
(952 messages posted)
Why would you want to use disc compression? It only slows things down.
The cost of hard drives today is minimal. You are better of buying a larger hard
drive.
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: cant find a disK compression utility
Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 3:55 pm Posted by Kiwi
(2064 messages posted)
As per the original answer, back when Win95 and Win98 were relatively new, storage
was very expensive, so even MS-DOS had its own compression function. Stacker was
the best known and most reliable of the aftermarket programs.
WinME was pretty terrible in its day, and was never hugely popular. If it didn't
have disk compression (with a "K", since it's not related to optical drives), it
was because the cost of storage had already begun dropping. It does seem to me that
W2K had such a function, however.
.
Kiwi
**
On Friday, February 22, 2008 at 9:02 pm, mntmanmaps wrote:
>Haven't used ME in a few years
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
|
re: cant find a disK compression utility
Monday, April 28, 2008 at 12:40 pm Posted by Ricer46
(19240 messages posted)
Another reason was that it was a terrible concept, that failed catastrophically on
a frequent basis. One bad file killed every file in the single compressed file.
On Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 3:55 pm, Kiwi wrote:
>As per the original answer, back when Win95 and Win98 were relatively new, storage
>was very expensive, so even MS-DOS had its own compression function. Stacker was
>the best known and most reliable of the aftermarket programs.
>
>WinME was pretty terrible in its day, and was never hugely popular. If it didn't
>have disk compression (with a "K", since it's not related to optical drives), it
>was because the cost of storage had already begun dropping. It does seem to me that
>W2K had such a function, however.
>
>
>
>
.
>
>Kiwi
>
>**
>
[Reply or follow-up to this message]
| |
Tip: Use one of the [Reply or follow-up to this message] links above to add a message to this thread
| |
Return to the Windows Me Discussion Forum
|
|
|
|