|
|
|
re: Wait for Vista or what?
Tuesday, May 23, 2006 at 8:37 am
Windows Vista Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by william
(148 messages posted)
By the way, With the system you described that you have, 2000 will run like its rear
is on fire. Im running XP on 512mb ram and 60gig HD with 64mb video and it is slower
than the machine I have 2000 on, which only has 224mb ram 80 gig HD and 32mb video.
On Tuesday, May 23, 2006 at 8:07 am, william wrote:
>Hi Enkel, Since your asking opinions, heres mine. I work on comps part time for
a
>living and most of my customers are either running XP or 98se. I have used all of
>them extensively at one time or another on my own machines.
>
>The best system there is to date in my opinion is Windows 2000. The XP system is
>based on it and im sure future systems will be too. Its super stable and will give
>you little to no problems. Its also going to be around for a good long time.
>
>Granted, its not all beautified like XP and it doesnt have some features that XP
>has. It will have the same kind of look and feel as your ME does right now. But
they
>make programs to spruce up such things if you really want them. I personally dont,
>I disable all that garbage.
>
>I have 3 machines in my home right now sharing a connect two of them have 2000 and
>one has XP home. In my case I have trouble with my XP all the time and in 3 yrs
of
>running 2000 on the others. Ive had I think two issues I needed to resolve. Its
a
>very stable system. Just my opinion.
>
>
>
- Written in response to:
- re: Wait for Vista or what? (william: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 at 8:07 am)
There are presently no replies to this message.
|
|
All messages in this thread [show all]
 |  |  | re: Wait for Vista or what? (william: Tue, May 23, 2006, 8:37 am) |
| |
| |
Return to the Windows Vista Discussion Forum
|
|
|
|
