re: Win Xp vs Win Vista....
Monday, July 17, 2006 at 6:02 pm Windows Vista Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by JACK
(3 messages posted)
the basis for most of what you will SEE, in Vista is to provide a new "look" to the
Windows OS, and you can best see where Microsoft was trying to "Go Today" by looking
at Mac OS X Tiger, its that close in many respects. But I digress.
The few security features will ADD a lot of overhead to your daily mouse clicking
and management of pop-up warnings, notices, and request for confirmation that will
"eat into your time" like never before. The number of notices to alter, agree, install,
accept etc is almost constant when you attempt to do anything from nearly the most
basic thing as changing the look or your colors, the Time and Date, not to mention
installing files.
The protection Vista offers you now is more pronounced in a way that is "In Your
FACE" with its chatty and vigilant attempt to regulate everything that happens (think
of good old Office Clippy). While it is true that the system seems to be a better
OS, the look and operation feel so much more like XP with a new shower curtain on
it, than a really new OS.
Buttons and Control Panels, have been moved, removed, grouped differently, so much
that you will spend a few days poking around the area just to see what is new, and
mostly what is Different, as opposed to new.
The Aero views have some benefit in the Windows being somewhat Transparent when laid
upon each other...you can see that there is something behind the window, but it is
fuzzy and you cant see for sure what it says if it is a Named File Icon on your desktop,
for instance. The transparency in Vista is a far cry from OS X, which lets you see
a clearer view of the icons and windows behind your main window, and this is adjustable
in a manner that Vista does not match.
I run a small network with a few Macs and PCs, access the web via cable modem and
a WIFi B/G router, and use Vista on a newer PC with 2GB of DDR2 RAM, ATI 128mb video
and Athlon 64 3400+, DVDRW and CDRW drives, a 160Gb and a 80GB EIDE (bootable) drives
for XP and Vista, and one 250GB SATA for other data. I can tell you that on this
system XP Pro is still Faster than Vista, so there surely must be some work left
to do to make this thing ready for real users.
|
All messages in this thread [show all]
 |  |  |  | re: Win Xp vs Win Vista.... (JACK: Mon, Jul 17, 2006, 6:02 pm) |
|