Lol...Whay to go Charlie







On Tuesday, April 1, 2008 at 12:22 pm, Charlie Hadden wrote:

>Though the wording does appear to be the same, there is no reason to believe that 

>this site you mentioned is the source. I WAS under the assumption that this site 

>was here for the purpose of helping to solve peoples problems and not to take credit 

>for anything. At least I'm not here to brag about my ability to impress others looking 

>up something that the person who asked the question could have done themselves had 

>they so desired or to edit my work so that it might look like it was professionally 

>edited. AND I seldom if ever see the sites most commonly referred to here list up 

>front that they have not only copied the wording they use from 10 other sites but 

>the exact layout of it also. AND I do not complain about Oreilly letting us do the 

>footwork to discover the best way to solve these questions and then write a book 

>not listing any credits to us. By the way did your comment or answer do anything 

>that would better help the person requesting the help? 

• Reply or follow-up to this message

• Search this forum
• Start a new thread on a different subject

• Report abuse of the forum