Annoyances.org
Home » Windows Vista Discussion Forum » Message 1244519354 Search | Help | Home
  
Tip: Run a free scan for common Windows errors ad

re: Is this really a vulnerability or just hype? Results of my tests, check the facts.
Monday, June 8, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Windows Vista Annoyances Discussion Forum
Posted by dmex (1 messages posted)


According to this article, Clickonce has less access than a traditional installer: 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/vbasic/ms789088.aspx

ClickOnce Can Not:
Install/Modify System Files
Install Drivers
Install Global Assembly Cache extensions
Install for Multiple Users
StartUp Automatically
Register/Modify FileTypes
Access/Modify the Registry
Patch/Modify any System Files other Application Files or your Files 
Install itself anywhere other than the ClickOnce application cache.

How is ClickOnce a security Issue even in the slightest?





On Thursday, June 4, 2009 at 4:04 pm, lbecque wrote:
>There seems to be a lot of mis-information and hype being spread around about this.
>See:
>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/05/microsoft_update_quietly_insta.html
>
>


>Is this truly a vulnerability? Can software run from a single click on a website
>without the user's knowledge? Is this a bad MS design?
>
>The MS developer at:
>http://blogs.msdn.com/brada/archive/2009/02/27/uninstalling-the-clickonce-support-for-firefox.aspx
>talks about the problem of not being able to uninstall it which now MS has fixed
>with a download which can be manually installed. So there is a fix to the uninstall,
>but if it is NOT uninstalled does this make Firefox vulnerable?
>


>I further found a previous version of this extension written as a legitimate FF extension
>at:
>https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1608
>The developer provided a way to test his extension at:
>http://www.softwarepunk.com/ffclickonce/testing.html
>


>I tested the MS version of this extension which is installed by default automatically
>(not the updated one from MS which was referred to in the blog site above, nor the
>FF developers version) by clicking on the link at:
>http://www.softwarepunk.com/clickonce/tester/deploy/publish.htm
>and you still get a dialogue that you are about to run an application with the ability
>to choose to cancel the operation. With that I can't see how this is a vulnerability
>unless there is a way to bypass this dialogue.
>


>I also did a search in Secuia's database and found this software but there are no
>vulnerability reports. I have sent a request to Secunia to ask if this is a vulnerability
>or at least has serious potential.
>


>I'm not saying that there isn't at least the potential for a vulnerability here but
>until someone can create a proof of concept of this vulnerability I'm not convinced.
> Also my test above does not confirm this vulnerability. Let's not create more hype
>about this without getting additional facts. There are plenty of real threats out
>there that we should focus on as well.




Written in response to:
Is this really a vulnerability or just hype? Results of my tests, check the facts. (lbecque: Thursday, June 4, 2009 at 4:04 pm)

Responses to this message:
*re: Is this really a vulnerability or just hype? Results of my tests, check the facts. (lbecque: Tuesday, June 9, 2009 at 10:28 am)

All messages in this thread [show all]
-Is this really a vulnerability or just hype? Results of my tests, check the facts. (lbecque: Thu, Jun 4, 2009, 4:04 pm)
-Important update and workaround (lbecque: Thu, Jun 4, 2009, 7:09 pm)
-re: Important update and workaround (Steve: Thu, Jun 4, 2009, 7:50 pm)
-re: Important update and workaround (Charlie Hadden: Fri, Jun 5, 2009, 5:33 am)
*re: Important update and workaround (Steve: Fri, Jun 5, 2009, 6:20 am)
-re: Is this really a vulnerability or just hype? Results of my tests, check the facts. (Daniel Weinreb: Sun, Jun 7, 2009, 6:13 am)
-re: Is this really a vulnerability or just hype? Results of my tests, check the facts. (lbecque: Sun, Jun 7, 2009, 8:26 am)
-re: Is this really a vulnerability or just hype? Results of my tests, check the facts. (Daniel Weinreb: Sun, Jun 7, 2009, 11:40 am)
*re: Is this really a vulnerability or just hype? Results of my tests, check the facts. (Hayes Whitt: Wed, Jun 10, 2009, 10:32 pm)
-re: Is this really a vulnerability or just hype? Results of my tests, check the facts. (dmex: Mon, Jun 8, 2009, 8:49 pm)
-re: Is this really a vulnerability or just hype? Results of my tests, check the facts. (lbecque: Tue, Jun 9, 2009, 10:28 am)
*re: Is this really a vulnerability or just hype? Results of my tests, check the facts. (Hayes Whitt: Thu, Jun 11, 2009, 2:14 pm)
Return to the Windows Vista Discussion Forum


All content at Annoyances.org is Copyright ©1995-2012 Creative Elementtm All rights reserved.
Please do not plagiarize; redistributing these pages without permission is strictly prohibited.