re: Clean install performance versus upgrade (from ME) Wednesday, November 14, 2001 at 9:29 pm Windows XP Annoyances Discussion Forum Posted by Krezno (433 messages posted) Personally i dont think it matters wheather you do a clean install or not. I have win me and havn't had any major problems unless I knowingly caused them myself, lol. Ive actually heard more complaints about xp than me. I'm sorry this probly doesn't help you much but I can't believe people are having so many wierd problems with win me, it boggles the mind. On Wednesday, November 14, 2001 at 8:34 pm, Xian wrote: >Everyone suggests doing a clean install, but for me that induces a bunch of backup >related headaches. My question is whether upgrading over WinMe has any significant >performance disadvantages versus a clean install... or is this somewhat nitpicky, >like folks that defrag weekly or scan EVERY file they d/l with anti-virus programs? > There tends to be a lot of supersitition for OSes... like everyone saying ME sucks >(does it)? Written in response to: Clean install performance versus upgrade (from ME) (Xian: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 at 8:34 pm) Responses to this message: re: Clean install performance versus upgrade (from ME) (Ralph Wiggum: Thursday, November 15, 2001 at 3:44 am) All messages in this thread [show all] Clean install performance versus upgrade (from ME) (Xian: Wed, Nov 14, 2001, 8:34 pm) re: Clean install performance versus upgrade (from ME) (Krezno: Wed, Nov 14, 2001, 9:29 pm) re: Clean install performance versus upgrade (from ME) (Ralph Wiggum: Thu, Nov 15, 2001, 3:44 am) re: Clean install performance versus upgrade (from ME) (John: Thu, Nov 15, 2001, 6:00 am) re: Clean install performance versus upgrade (from ME) (Ray B: Thu, Nov 15, 2001, 9:07 pm) Reply or follow-up to this message Search this forum Start a new thread on a different subject Report abuse of the forum Return to the Windows XP Discussion Forum